Latest Influencer News in 2025
Elon Musk In Trouble With This Tesla Killer
Tesla may soon have a serious rival on its hands—and it’s not from the usual suspects like Ford or Rivian. A startup called Slate Automotive has officially unveiled its first vehicle, a compact, no-frills electric pickup priced at just $25,000. It’s already being dubbed a potential “Tesla killer,” thanks to its refreshingly simple design, high level of customization, and focus on affordability. Emerging from stealth mode just recently, Slate Automotive is partially backed by none other than Jeff Bezos—yes, the Amazon founder himself—adding an extra layer of intrigue to this new EV player. The company is now taking $50 refundable deposits ahead of expected deliveries in late 2026. What Makes Slate Different? The entry-level model, dubbed the “Blank Slate,” gets an estimated 150 miles of range from a 52.7-kWh battery. For those needing more distance, an optional 84.3-kWh battery pack pushes that range up to 240 miles. The truck comes in one basic color—gray—molded directly into its body panels to reduce production costs. Instead of splurging on features like built-in screens or fancy paint jobs, Slate is focused on a modular design philosophy that keeps manufacturing lean and prices low. In fact, by avoiding complex manufacturing steps like metal stamping and painting, Slate estimates it has saved between $350 million and $500 million. CEO Chris Barman says this streamlined approach allows them to produce up to 150,000 units annually—an ambitious figure, but one that underscores the startup’s serious intentions. Customization Without Complication While the truck may look plain on paper, Slate’s real secret weapon is its customization potential. Instead of offering multiple factory-built variants, Slate plans to sell over 100 accessories, including full kits that can convert the basic two-door pickup into either a two-door SUV or a fastback-style utility vehicle. These modular add-ons let owners build the vehicle they want, whether for urban commuting, light hauling, or adventurous getaways. Accessories include console kits, wrap options, upgraded seat covers, and even conversion kits to turn manual windows electric. For buyers interested in turning their pickup into a five-seat SUV, the conversion kit will run about $5,000. Slate also promises a “Builder’s Book” to help guide DIY enthusiasts through these modifications. Simplicity by Design The vehicle doesn’t come with a central infotainment screen. Instead, buyers are given a variety of phone and tablet mounts. A backup camera is standard, but its display appears in the digital gauge cluster behind the steering wheel. All required safety features, including automatic emergency braking and airbags, are built into the design. Under the hood (or rather, behind the wheel), the Slate pickup is powered by a 150-kilowatt (201-horsepower) motor and runs on a rear-wheel drive system. It features DC fast charging at speeds up to 120 kW and uses the same NACS connector found on Tesla vehicles. Performance-wise, the pickup weighs in at 3,600 pounds and can haul a payload of 1,430 pounds, though it lags behind rivals like the Ford Maverick in towing capacity. A Challenge for Tesla? While Tesla continues to chase high-performance and luxury EV markets, Slate is making a bet on simplicity and affordability. It’s a play that could resonate deeply with younger drivers and first-time EV buyers, particularly those priced out of the premium EV segment. With Bezos-linked funding and a clever production model, Slate may be positioned to shake up the EV pickup space before Tesla’s much-delayed Cybertruck even goes mainstream. And with a design that harks back to retro American trucks—compact, practical, and modifiable—Slate may be tapping into a nostalgic desire for straightforward vehicles in a market filled with tech-heavy complexity. If Musk wasn’t paying attention before, he probably is now.
From Tradition to TikTok: How “Tung Tung Tung Sahur” Became Ramadan’s Funniest Alarm Clock
Not all viral memes start with a dance or a celebrity. Sometimes, all it takes is a wooden log with a bat, a catchy chant, and a centuries-old tradition. The “Tung Tung Tung Sahur” meme has taken over timelines with its oddball charm and rhythmic call to wake up—and it’s tied to a ritual far more meaningful than most might realize. A Tradition with a Twist To understand why this meme has become a sensation, it helps to know a little about sahur—the pre-dawn meal Muslims eat during Ramadan to prepare for a day of fasting. In parts of Indonesia and other Muslim-majority regions, it’s common for volunteers or community members to walk the streets early in the morning, beating drums and calling out to wake up their neighbors in time for sahur. That’s where “Tung Tung Tung” comes from—an onomatopoeic take on the sound of those rhythmic drumbeats. But how did this cultural tradition make its way to TikTok? Enter the Log with a Bat The viral spark came in February 2025 when TikTok creator @noxaasht posted a meme that featured an animated wooden log—shaped like an oversized rolling pin or traditional Indian mugdar—clutching a baseball bat and rhythmically chanting “Tung Tung Tung Sahur.” The absurdity of the animation, mixed with the catchy chant, hit the sweet spot for meme lovers worldwide. Soon, the log became a symbol of chaotic pre-dawn energy. Users began recreating the meme using filters, AI-generated characters, and remixed versions of the chant, giving rise to a full-blown trend across platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and even YouTube Shorts. Why This Meme Hit Home Part of the meme’s success lies in its mix of humor and cultural familiarity. For many Muslims, the pre-dawn call to sahur is a nostalgic memory—sometimes annoying, sometimes endearing. The “Tung Tung Tung” chant captures the playful spirit of those early morning wake-ups in a way that transcends language. At the same time, the meme taps into a larger internet trend: bizarre, surreal animations with repetitive sounds or phrases. Think Skibidi Toilet or Talking Ben—"Tung Tung Tung Sahur" fits right in but comes with an unexpected cultural layer that gives it staying power beyond the usual meme lifecycle. From Memes to Filters The meme’s popularity has also inspired creativity in how it’s used. Some creators have made parody videos of themselves being “attacked” by the log for oversleeping. Others have added music production elements, remixing the chant into EDM tracks or fusing it with local instruments. In a way, “Tung Tung Tung Sahur” has gone from a funny internet video to a full-on participatory phenomenon. There’s even a growing number of filters and effects based on the log and its distinctive chant, which people use in their own wake-up call videos. A Wake-Up Call With Viral Power What started as a quirky TikTok clip has now evolved into something more than just a joke. It’s a reminder of how cultural traditions can unexpectedly go viral in the digital age—and how younger generations are remixing their heritage in funny, fresh ways. And while the future of any meme is always uncertain, the legacy of “Tung Tung Tung Sahur” feels different. Whether it fades in a few months or becomes a recurring Ramadan tradition online, it’s already carved a place in meme history—one rhythmic beat at a time.
Gabriella Zuniga: The OnlyFans Creator at the Center of Shannon Sharpe’s $50 Million Lawsuit
What began as a high-profile lawsuit against sports commentator and former NFL star Shannon Sharpe has taken a new turn. The anonymous woman known only as “Jane Doe” in court documents is now widely speculated to be Gabriella “Gabbi” Zuniga — a 20-year-old model and OnlyFans content creator. Although neither the courts nor Sharpe’s legal team have confirmed her identity, social media sleuths believe they’ve found the woman behind the accusations, adding a new wave of intrigue to an already controversial case. From Anonymous Accuser to Viral Name When news broke that Sharpe was being sued for $50 million over alleged rape, emotional abuse, and secret recordings, details were scarce. The accuser remained unnamed, following a standard legal practice in sensitive cases. But within days, speculation began swirling online. Twitter, Reddit, and TikTok were soon flooded with posts pointing to Gabbi Zuniga as the potential plaintiff. Accounts like WorldStarHipHop, OnSite, and The Neighborhood Talk shared viral posts identifying Zuniga. According to those posts, Gabbi had allegedly been romantically involved with Sharpe and may have been the person seen in leaked screenshots, video clips, and old social media posts linked to the case. Some claimed these materials showed her in private spaces that match descriptions in the lawsuit, including what appears to be Sharpe’s home or hotel rooms. While none of these claims have been officially verified, the internet’s detective work has thrust Zuniga into an uncomfortable spotlight. Screenshots of DMs, alleged texts with Sharpe, and content from her previously public social media accounts are circulating widely, turning her into a trending topic overnight. Who Is Gabbi Zuniga? Before this legal storm, Gabriella Zuniga maintained a relatively low online profile. She had a small following on TikTok, operated a modest OnlyFans account, and posted occasionally on Instagram under the handle @sheiskarli. Rumors suggest she met Sharpe sometime in 2023 at a gym in West Hollywood. She was 20 at the time. Described by followers as a fitness enthusiast and aspiring influencer, Zuniga had not previously been part of any major media stories. But now, she’s caught in the middle of a legal and media frenzy, her name tossed around in forums and threads with varying degrees of accuracy and sensitivity. Since the rumors gained traction, Zuniga’s social media presence has all but vanished. Her Instagram is now private, and other platforms where she was once active appear to have been deleted or locked down. Despite the silence from her side, the internet has not slowed down in its efforts to connect her to the lawsuit. Legal Silence, Public Noise While the online world debates and speculates, Shannon Sharpe’s legal team has stuck to the official script, continuing to refer to the accuser only as “Jane Doe.” No formal statement has been made acknowledging Zuniga’s name, and the court documents have not been updated to reflect the viral allegations. Legal experts note that using pseudonyms in civil cases involving sexual misconduct is common practice, designed to protect victims from public scrutiny. But in the age of internet investigations, such anonymity is increasingly difficult to maintain. The viral outing of “Jane Doe” as Zuniga — whether accurate or not — has created significant real-world consequences, including online harassment and media intrusion. The Fallout and What’s Next Whether Gabbi Zuniga is, in fact, the plaintiff behind the lawsuit may eventually come to light as the legal proceedings unfold. For now, her name is closely associated with one of the most explosive celebrity lawsuits of the year, thanks largely to the power and reach of social media. As of now, the lawsuit is ongoing, and the speculation continues. But one thing is certain: the internet has turned what began as a private legal matter into a full-blown public spectacle, with Gabriella Zuniga — willingly or not — at the center of it.
Leaked iPhone 17 Dummy Models Leave the Internet Disappointed
The latest glimpse at Apple’s upcoming iPhone 17 lineup isn’t winning any popularity contests. New images showing dummy units of all four expected models — including the slimmed-down iPhone 17 Air — have surfaced online, and the internet’s reaction has been less than enthusiastic. In fact, many users are openly calling the designs "ugly," "boring," and "disappointing." Shared by tech leaker @SonnyDickson and picked up by GSMArena, the photos show what are believed to be mock-ups of Apple’s upcoming devices in both black and white color options. The dummy units display flat-colored backs and feature noticeably large camera bumps — a design shift that seems to have divided fans. A Peek at the Full Lineup The dummy units reportedly represent all four models expected in the iPhone 17 series, and while none of the images confirm internal specs, they do offer a sense of what the devices might look like in-hand. Notably, the iPhone 17 Air — a new addition to the lineup — appears significantly thinner than the other models, a detail that aligns with earlier rumors suggesting Apple was working on a sleeker, more lightweight device. Interestingly, the dummy models show a uniform, single-color design on the rear, contradicting earlier leaks that hinted at a two-tone aesthetic. If accurate, this suggests Apple is opting for a cleaner, simpler look this time around — but it’s a change not everyone appreciates. Internet Reactions: Brutal From Reddit to X (formerly Twitter), users haven’t held back. Comments range from mild disappointment to full-on roasting of the new designs. “Those are so ugly,” one Redditor wrote bluntly. Others piled on, calling the new camera modules “monstrosities” and comparing the devices to “cheap knockoffs.” While a few users expressed some interest in the thinner iPhone 17 Air, even that model wasn’t spared from criticism about its oversized camera array and plain design. Across multiple tech forums, users expressed frustration over what they perceive as Apple’s lack of innovation in design. “This feels like iPhone 13 with a bigger wart on the back,” one commenter joked. Others criticized the company for playing it safe and ignoring consumer feedback. Despite the backlash, a handful of users pointed out that dummy units don’t always reflect the final product. Some argued that better materials, finishes, and real-world lighting could improve the overall impression once the phones are officially revealed. How Accurate Are These Dummies? While dummy units are often based on leaked schematics or early information from the supply chain, they aren’t official Apple products. Still, these new mock-ups are consistent with past leaks and rumors, particularly regarding the larger camera bumps and the simplified rear panel design. These leaks may be part of a coordinated wave of pre-release hype — or they could just be based on industry insider info that’s trickled down to accessory manufacturers and leakers. Either way, they’re likely to give a close approximation of what to expect when Apple unveils the iPhone 17 lineup later this year. Design Fatigue or Genuine Flop? Apple’s design choices have often sparked heated debates, but this time, the dissatisfaction seems louder than usual. With many feeling that the company has stuck too closely to previous generations’ looks — while enlarging and emphasizing the cameras yet again — there’s growing sentiment that Apple’s aesthetic choices may be missing the mark. Whether these early impressions impact actual sales remains to be seen. Apple has a history of weathering negative early reactions only to see huge demand when devices hit the market. Still, it’s clear from online chatter that the iPhone 17 — or at least these early mock-ups — hasn’t exactly wowed the crowd. Until the official unveiling, fans and critics alike will have to wait and see if Apple can change hearts and minds when the final models are revealed. For now, though, the buzz is more about what people don’t like — and that’s not the kind of reaction Apple is likely hoping for.
Nintendo Switch 2 Pre-Orders Went Live — And It Was Total Chaos
If you were among the thousands (or maybe millions) of fans hoping to secure a Nintendo Switch 2 at launch, you probably experienced the same frustration many others did last night: endless queues, error messages, and even last-minute order cancellations. What should have been an exciting kickoff for Nintendo’s next-gen console turned into a digital disaster, with buyers scrambling to claim a console before stock vanished within minutes. Pre-orders for the highly anticipated Nintendo Switch 2 officially went live at midnight Eastern Time (9 PM PT) at major retailers like Walmart, Target, and Best Buy. But from the moment the listings were supposed to go live, things started to unravel — fast. Digital Queues and Sudden Crashes At Walmart, hopeful customers were funneled into a virtual line almost instantly. Some made it through and managed to snag a console. Others, however, were left staring at an endless “stay in line” screen, uncertain whether they were inching closer to success or simply wasting their time. For many, the process ended in frustration, glitches, and even blank error messages after reaching the final checkout step. Target took a different approach — no queue at all — which initially seemed to make for a smoother experience. That illusion didn’t last long. Buyers began reporting that even after successfully placing an order and receiving confirmation, their transactions were suddenly canceled. Others saw the Nintendo Switch 2 disappear from their carts mid-checkout. Needless to say, tensions ran high. Best Buy Was Late to the Party Best Buy, meanwhile, didn’t even get its act together on time. The listing page stubbornly read “Coming Soon” well past midnight before the store finally launched its own queue system. While a lucky few managed to place their orders, many were stuck refreshing the page or stuck in line indefinitely. Several buyers also reported encountering fraud alerts from their banks, adding yet another layer of complication to an already chaotic night. By the time most people were settling into bed, both Walmart and Target were sold out. Best Buy was still processing orders, albeit inconsistently, with many customers unsure if their purchases were even going through. Some received email confirmations, only to later be informed their order was delayed or canceled without a clear explanation. Why the Confusion? Nintendo fans are used to a certain level of hype when a new console is announced, but this rollout feels particularly messy. Even before pre-orders opened, confusion had been brewing around the Switch 2. The price tag — especially when factoring in accessories and launch titles — left many fans in sticker shock. Nintendo paused pre-orders temporarily earlier this month, citing tariff-related concerns in the U.S., only to reopen them with no change in the console’s pricing structure. Accessories, on the other hand, did see adjustments — adding even more confusion about what was included and what would need to be bought separately. Adding to the frustration is the lack of clarity from Nintendo regarding software formats, pricing, and compatibility. With many fans unsure about what they’re getting or how much they’ll end up paying, the actual process of trying to order the console became just another pain point. What’s Next? For those who missed out, there are still options on the horizon. GameStop is expected to open pre-orders both online and in-store at 11 AM ET today. And some lucky Nintendo account holders may receive direct pre-order invites from Nintendo in May. But those invites aren’t guaranteed — and Nintendo has already acknowledged that demand in Japan alone is far exceeding their projected supply. So, if you’re hoping to play Mario Kart World or other Switch 2 exclusives on day one, the pre-order struggle is likely far from over. The reality is clear: the Nintendo Switch 2 is going to be incredibly hard to get for a while. And unless Nintendo drastically ramps up supply — or finds a way to streamline their launch process — this bumpy road to next-gen gaming is just getting started.
Who Is Joseph Zada? Meet the Actor Taking on Young Haymitch in The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping
Joseph Zada may not yet be a household name—but that’s about to change. The fast-rising actor has just landed the role of young Haymitch Abernathy in The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping, the highly anticipated prequel to one of the most iconic film franchises of the last two decades. With a major role in a Suzanne Collins adaptation and a fanbase eager to dive deeper into Panem’s darkest history, Zada is stepping into the spotlight in a big way. But who is the actor behind the next face of District 12? From Indie Roots to Hollywood Breakout Joseph Zada's acting journey began far from the glittering chaos of blockbuster cinema. Known for his work in indie films and a few standout roles on streaming platforms, Zada has built a quiet but solid reputation for delivering emotionally grounded performances. While his earlier projects didn’t make mainstream waves, critics have often praised him for his authenticity, subtle intensity, and screen presence. He’s appeared in several indie dramas over the past few years, where he’s often cast as emotionally conflicted characters navigating complex relationships or moral dilemmas. This might be one reason Lionsgate saw him as a natural choice to portray Haymitch Abernathy, a character known for his layers, inner turmoil, and rebellious streak. Taking on an Iconic Role In The Hunger Games universe, Haymitch is a cornerstone figure—mentor to Katniss Everdeen and Peeta Mellark, a past victor of the brutal Games, and a man broken by trauma and the burden of survival. Originally played by Woody Harrelson in the original films, Haymitch is sarcastic, guarded, and frequently intoxicated—but also deeply loyal and wise. In Sunrise on the Reaping, audiences will meet a very different version of Haymitch: younger, idealistic, and just beginning to grasp the cruelty of the Capitol. The film, based on Suzanne Collins’ newest novel, takes place during the 50th Hunger Games—also known as the Second Quarter Quell—where Haymitch's legendary and painful victory story unfolds. Zada’s task? To breathe life into a character fans thought they already knew and show the evolution from brave tribute to bitter, reluctant mentor. The Pressure and the Promise Stepping into a well-established franchise comes with major expectations. Fans are already buzzing about how Zada will interpret Haymitch and whether he can live up to Harrelson’s memorable performance. But early reactions to his casting have been largely positive, with many praising the choice of a fresh face over a bigger, more expected name. And Zada isn’t doing it alone. He’ll be starring opposite Whitney Peak, who plays Leonore Dove Baird—Haymitch’s girlfriend and emotional anchor leading up to his time in the arena. Their on-screen chemistry is expected to form the emotional backbone of the film, giving audiences a new perspective on what Haymitch lost long before he became a mentor. A Star on the Rise While this may be Joseph Zada’s breakout role, industry insiders suggest it won’t be his last. Known for his dedication to character development and preference for emotionally rich scripts, Zada is part of a new generation of actors blending raw talent with range and quiet charisma. The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping is set for a theatrical release on November 20, 2026, and it could mark a major turning point in Zada’s career. With the global fanbase of The Hunger Games watching closely, it’s a chance for the actor to prove he can carry a franchise—and redefine a beloved character in the process. Whether you’re a longtime Hunger Games fan or just now hearing about Joseph Zada, one thing is clear: he’s a name you’ll want to remember. Because when Sunrise on the Reaping hits theaters, Zada isn’t just playing a tribute—he’s stepping into the arena of stardom.
Shanghai’s Gold ATM Goes Viral as Record Prices Spark Modern-Day Rush
A futuristic spin on an age-old tradition is making waves in Shanghai—and it’s all thanks to a vending machine that melts gold on the spot. As global gold prices soar to historic highs, residents are lining up in droves to cash in their jewelry through a high-tech “gold recycling ATM,” which has gone viral across social media platforms in China. The phenomenon began shortly after gold prices reached a new record of $2,141.79 per ounce, breaking a peak that had stood since December. In a climate of economic caution and investment uncertainty, the machine has arrived at just the right moment for many looking to convert gold heirlooms into quick cash. How the Gold ATM Works Installed at Shanghai’s Global Harbour shopping mall, the sleek gold recycling machine is part of Shenzhen-based Kinghood Group’s "Smart Gold Store" concept. The ATM-style kiosk accepts gold items over 3 grams with a minimum purity of 50%. Customers place their jewelry into a tray, where the machine weighs it, melts it at over 1,000°C, and tests its purity—all within half an hour. Users are updated on the process via a live screen display. After deducting a small service fee (about $2.50 per gram), the machine deposits the equivalent cash directly into the user’s bank account. No haggling. No waiting days for a quote. Just real-time evaluation and instant payment. Viral Buzz and Social Media Frenzy It didn’t take long for the internet to catch wind of the machine. Videos showing long queues of residents—many of them elderly—spread rapidly on Weibo, Douyin (China’s TikTok), and Xiaohongshu. The footage shows people clutching bags of old jewelry, eagerly watching their items be melted down in front of them. One user posted, “I watched my grandma trade in a necklace from her wedding 50 years ago and get over 10,000 yuan in minutes!” Another commented, “Why would anyone go to a pawn shop anymore? This is so much clearer and quicker.” This digital enthusiasm helped turn what could have been a niche service into a full-blown trend, turning gold selling into an accessible and even trendy experience. Changing the Game for Traditional Gold Traders Not everyone is thrilled by the buzz. Traditional gold shops and small-scale dealers are already feeling the impact. “We can’t compete with that kind of turnaround time,” admitted one jewelry store owner in Shanghai. “Even though our rates are sometimes better, people are choosing convenience over price.” The ATM’s popularity is not just a gimmick—it’s part of Kinghood’s broader strategy. The company has already placed similar machines in over 40 cities across China and is preparing to expand further into hubs like Beijing and Guangzhou. Plans for over 100 new installations are underway. The Timing: Gold’s Meteoric Rise The spike in demand for these machines is closely tied to the rally in gold prices. On April 16, 2024—the day the Shanghai machine went live—domestic gold rates had passed 1,000 yuan per gram. This spike was fueled by ongoing geopolitical tensions and increased demand from global central banks, which continue to stockpile the precious metal as a hedge against inflation. Analysts say more people are seeing gold not just as a sentimental keepsake, but as a liquid asset that can offer real financial relief. Still, experts urge caution. Xu Weixin from the Shanghai Gold Association noted, “We’re at historic highs now, but no one can predict what will happen next. Those selling might benefit today, but they should weigh their long-term options.” The New Face of the Gold Rush What’s remarkable isn’t just the tech—it’s the people behind the trend. Older women, often the caretakers of family heirlooms, are leading the wave, turning wedding bands, old bangles, and inherited trinkets into cash for daily use, savings, or helping family members. This viral ATM has not only revolutionized gold selling—it’s sparked a cultural moment. By combining real-time technology, financial pragmatism, and viral visibility, Shanghai’s gold ATM has given rise to a new kind of gold rush. And with machines set to pop up in more cities soon, this trend shows no signs of cooling down. In a world where speed and simplicity are prized, turning gold into instant cash might just be the new normal.
“Honest Mistake” or Irreparable Harm? Jury Rules New York Times Didn’t Defame Sarah Palin—Again
In a courtroom saga that’s stretched nearly a decade, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin has once again lost her defamation case against The New York Times. A Manhattan jury ruled that the newspaper did not defame the one-time Republican vice-presidential candidate in a controversial 2017 editorial — marking the second time a jury has sided with the Times in this high-profile media battle. The ruling comes after Palin was granted a retrial due to concerns about jury bias in the original 2022 case, which also ended in defeat for her. This time, though, the courtroom was more closely watched, as the verdict could have had far-reaching implications for press freedoms and the legal thresholds public figures must meet in defamation cases. The Controversial Editorial The editorial at the heart of Palin’s lawsuit, titled America’s Lethal Politics, was written by former Times opinion editor James Bennet. It was published in response to a 2017 shooting at a congressional baseball practice, and in it, Bennet referenced a 2011 mass shooting in Arizona that wounded then-Representative Gabby Giffords and left six others dead. The piece included a line suggesting a “clear” link between heated political rhetoric — including a map distributed by a Palin-affiliated PAC that placed stylized crosshairs over certain congressional districts — and the violent act. Though the editorial was quickly corrected (14 hours later), Palin claimed the damage to her reputation had already been done. Palin’s Fight for Accountability Palin sued in 2017, arguing that the Times had acted with “actual malice” — a necessary standard for defamation involving public figures, which requires proof that the publication either knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. Her legal team claimed that the mistake wasn't innocent. In closing arguments, her lawyer Ken Turkel said the editorial was “a life-changer” for Palin, and that the Times’ quick correction didn’t erase the harm done to her public image. But the jury didn’t agree. A Legal Line Not Crossed The Times maintained throughout the trial that the error in the editorial was just that — a mistake, not a malicious or intentional smear campaign. “There has not been one shred of evidence showing anything other than an honest mistake,” said attorney Felicia Ellsworth, who represented the newspaper. That argument ultimately prevailed, with the jury determining there was no defamation. The Times responded with a statement celebrating the verdict as a win for journalistic integrity, saying the outcome “reaffirms an important tenet of American law: publishers are not liable for honest mistakes.” What It Means for Media — and Public Figures This ruling, though centered on Palin, reverberates far beyond one politician’s personal reputation. It reinforces the legal precedent that public figures must meet a high bar to win defamation cases — a standard that has protected journalists and publishers for decades under the First Amendment. Legal analysts suggest this latest decision underscores the difficulty of proving malice without clear evidence of intent or disregard for truth. For Palin and her supporters, it’s a frustrating reminder of just how uphill the battle is for public figures who feel wronged by the press. The Political and Personal Fallout Palin, now 61, hasn’t seen a major political win in years. She lost two congressional bids in Alaska in 2022 and hasn’t held public office since stepping down as governor in 2009. Once a rising star in conservative politics, her influence has faded — though she remains a polarizing figure and frequent media lightning rod. The verdict marks the likely end of her legal campaign against The New York Times. And while the case may be closed, the broader questions it raises — about media responsibility, free speech, and public trust — remain wide open.
RFK Jr.’s Autism Registry Plan Sparks Online Firestorm — Here’s What You Need to Know
A newly announced autism research initiative, backed by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is drawing massive online attention — and not all of it is supportive. The project’s scope is sweeping: it aims to link an unprecedented amount of medical, pharmaceutical, genomic, and wearable data into one centralized platform for autism research. Supporters say it could revolutionize autism science. Critics call it invasive, stigmatizing, and deeply problematic. Social media erupted within hours of the announcement, with #RFKAutismRegistry trending on X (formerly Twitter), Instagram stories buzzing with hot takes, and Reddit threads dissecting the ethics and science behind the effort. On one side are those who believe this represents a turning point in understanding autism. On the other, many argue the entire premise feels more like surveillance than science. What’s the Plan? According to National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, the initiative will consolidate data from a wide range of sources: prescription records from major pharmacy chains, genomic testing data, claims from private insurance, and even fitness data from smartwatches. Medical records from the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Indian Health Service are also part of the mix. All of this will feed into a centralized research platform designed to study autism on a national scale. The most controversial part? A new registry specifically for Americans with autism, which will be integrated into this data trove. Critics argue that labeling and tracking people in this way risks stigmatization — especially considering Kennedy has repeatedly referred to autism as “preventable,” a claim many experts reject outright. RFK Jr. Under Fire Kennedy’s long history of controversial health claims has only amplified the skepticism. While he’s insisted that the study will be ethical, private, and scientifically rigorous, many advocacy groups are voicing concern. "Calling autism preventable is not only inaccurate, it's dangerous," said one parent in a viral TikTok video. "It implies blame. It implies there’s something wrong with our kids.” Others worry about the potential misuse of data. While Bhattacharya has emphasized that researchers will not be able to download the private health information — and that “state-of-the-art protections” will be in place — privacy watchdogs remain wary. Data breaches are not a hypothetical concern, and critics argue that centralizing so much sensitive information is inherently risky. Supporters See a Game-Changer Despite the backlash, there’s a sizable contingent online applauding the initiative. Many point out that autism remains under-researched, and a more complete understanding could lead to better support, therapies, and resources for families. "This could be the biggest autism study in history," wrote one X user. "If it’s done ethically and transparently, the benefits could be huge." Bhattacharya described the project as a "transformative real-world data initiative" aimed at giving researchers broad access to previously fragmented datasets. Between 10 and 20 outside research groups will be selected for funding through the usual NIH grant process to explore questions ranging from basic science to real-world applications in autism care. Science, Ethics, and the Timeline When Kennedy first announced the initiative, he suggested the causes of autism could be pinpointed by September. That bold claim has already been walked back. Bhattacharya, speaking to reporters this week, said they now hope to issue research grants by then, but the research timeline remains flexible. “It’s hard to guarantee when science will make an advance,” he said. “Nature has its say.” The NIH director acknowledged the wide spectrum of autism experiences, noting that research would be designed to reflect the diversity within the autistic community — from highly verbal, independent individuals to those with more significant needs. Where Do You Stand? As the debate rages, one thing is clear: this initiative has touched a nerve. It sits at the intersection of public health, personal privacy, disability rights, and trust in government — all hot-button issues in today’s digital age. Whether this project becomes a landmark study or an ongoing controversy will depend largely on how it’s executed — and whether it can earn the trust of the very communities it aims to serve. So, where do you land? Is this the breakthrough autism research needs — or a step too far?
Did Jeffree Star Reveal His Affair With Kanye West On Twitter?
Jeffree Star has once again ignited the internet—this time with just eight words. On April 22, the beauty mogul tweeted, “Ok f*ck it.. The rumors were true,” prompting social media users to speculate whether he was finally confirming the long-circulated rumor about an alleged affair with Kanye West. The tweet comes at a particularly charged time for Kanye, who is facing backlash over the lyrics of his newly released track Cousin. The controversial song has stirred conversations online, especially as it touches on disturbing family history. The timing of Jeffree’s message has raised eyebrows, with many wondering whether it’s a subtle dig or an intentional revelation. A Rumor That Just Won’t Die The rumors linking Star and West first exploded in early 2021, when TikTok influencer Ava Louise alleged that the rapper had been romantically involved with a “very famous male beauty guru.” Internet sleuths quickly connected the dots, pointing to Star due to his residence in Wyoming—coincidentally, the same state where Kanye owned a ranch at the time—and an old lyric from Star referencing West. Despite the internet frenzy, Star was quick to deny the rumor in a YouTube video titled “Addressing The Kanye Situation.” Laughing off the accusation, he said, “This is so stupid... I’ve never even hung out with Kanye.” He went further to joke, “Let me just say this once—I like very tall men,” hinting that West wasn’t his type. Ava Louise later admitted she made the story up entirely, claiming she wanted to stir up drama. Still, the internet never really let the narrative go, and Star continued to face questions about it in various interviews, including with Logan Paul and US Weekly. Each time, he denied any involvement and called the rumor ridiculous. Is Jeffree Changing His Story? That’s the question fans are grappling with after Star’s latest tweet. The lack of context has only fueled speculation. One user on X (formerly Twitter) commented, “Wait what does this mean?” while another chimed in, “Is this about Kanye???” So far, Kanye West and his representatives have remained silent on the matter. Given the rapper’s recent history of airing deeply personal content online, fans are split between thinking Star is trying to stir the pot—or that he’s actually hinting at a real story. Troll Move or Truth Bomb? Jeffree Star is no stranger to controversy or viral moments. From beauty industry feuds to political drama, the entrepreneur knows how to command attention online. Some believe this tweet is simply another example of Star’s ability to hijack trending topics and spin them into publicity. But others wonder whether there’s more to the story than he previously let on. Could Star be referencing a fleeting encounter? Was his earlier denial meant to protect someone’s privacy? Or is this just Star poking fun at a rumor that refuses to die? Regardless of his intentions, Star’s post has succeeded in reigniting one of the internet’s favorite pop culture conspiracies. With millions of views and thousands of reposts, the buzz shows no sign of slowing down. No Confirmation From Kanye As of now, Kanye has neither confirmed nor denied the rumor. Given the rapper’s unpredictable social media habits and the chaotic nature of his recent posts, it’s unclear if he’ll even address it. But one thing is for sure—when it comes to Jeffree Star and Kanye West, the internet never forgets. Whether this is a real admission or just another layer of internet trolling, fans are eating it up—and begging for more. Until then, the truth remains somewhere between a tweet and a tall tale.
Viral Aussie Twins Trained by Steve Irwin: The Incredible Story Behind Paula and Bridgette Powers
They may have gone viral for a surreal TV interview about a local crime, but sisters Paula and Bridgette Powers are much more than just a quirky viral moment. The identical twins from Queensland have dedicated their lives to caring for Australia’s native birds—and their story is deeply intertwined with the legacy of one of the country’s most beloved conservationists. The Powers twins recently caught global attention after a 90-second segment aired on Channel 7 News. The clip, which showed the pair speaking in perfect unison and dressed identically, detailed their eyewitness account of an alleged carjacking near their Sunshine Coast home. While the bizarre synchronicity of their responses drew laughs and fascination, many viewers had no idea about the twins' lifelong dedication to wildlife rescue. A Life of Service to Wildlife Paula and Bridgette Powers are not your average viral sensations. For years, the duo has operated Twinnies Pelican and Seabird Rescue, a not-for-profit organization committed to rehabilitating injured or sick coastal birds. They’ve cared for everything from pelicans tangled in fishing lines to young ducks in need of rehoming. In fact, just days before their unexpected TV fame, the twins shared a heartwarming update on social media showing more than a dozen ducks they had raised and safely released back into the wild. What truly sets their story apart, however, is their mentorship under none other than Steve Irwin—the legendary Crocodile Hunter. Trained by Irwin himself, the twins credit much of their hands-on skills and passion for animal care to the late conservation icon. Their calm, unified approach to rescue work reflects not just their close bond as siblings, but also a deeply instilled ethos of compassion and respect for nature. A Viral Moment with a Serious Backstory The recent media spotlight came after a dramatic roadside incident. While driving on Steve Irwin Way, the Powers family encountered a vehicle that had crashed. As their mother approached the car to offer help, the driver—covered in blood—allegedly pulled a gun. Paula and Bridgette described their panic in perfect harmony during the interview, saying, "Our hearts started to pound. And I said Mum, where's Mum?" They recalled how their mother managed to distract the man long enough for all three to escape safely. The man involved has since been charged with multiple offences, including armed robbery and dangerous driving causing death. Thankfully, the Powers family was unharmed—but the encounter added another dramatic chapter to the twins’ already extraordinary story. Not Their First Time in the Spotlight This isn’t the first time the sisters have gone viral. Back in 2016, they charmed audiences on Good Morning Britain, where they were interviewed by Piers Morgan and Susannah Reid. Once again, their identical speech patterns and infectious laughter stole the show. At the time, the twins acknowledged how deeply connected they feel. “Sometimes we do feel like just one person,” they admitted. In the wake of their recent interview, the Powers twins have been featured in countless online posts and even a parody by Australian comedian Devon Poole. But as amusing as the public finds their synchronized quirks, the twins remain focused on their mission. How You Can Help While they’re currently taking a short break from interviews, Paula and Bridgette are still active on social media, sharing updates on the birds they care for. Their passion is real, and their work is vital—especially as Australia's native wildlife faces increasing threats from habitat loss and human interference. For those inspired by their story, donations to their rescue organization can go a long way in helping them continue their work. Whether it's rescuing pelicans, raising orphaned ducklings, or rehabilitating injured magpies, the Twinnies have proven that two hearts—and four hands—can make a world of difference. From being mentored by Steve Irwin to becoming a viral phenomenon, the Powers twins are a one-of-a-kind duo whose story is equal parts heartwarming and heroic.
Cinco De Mayo Cancelled In Chicago: Here’s The Heartbreaking Reason Why
Chicago’s vibrant and long-standing Cinco de Mayo Parade has been cancelled this year, and the reason has sparked heartbreak, outrage, and debate across the city. The decision, announced by organizers on Thursday, stems from deep concerns about possible Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activity supported by Donald Trump, targeting the city's immigrant communities. The parade, a fixture in the city's cultural calendar and a beloved celebration of Mexican heritage, was scheduled to take place on Chicago’s Southwest Side. But amid increasing fear of immigration raids tied to the Trump administration's renewed push for mass deportations, organizers say safety must come first. “Our people are scared,” said Hector Escobar, President of the Casa Puebla & Cermak Road Chamber of Commerce. “Some of them don’t even want to go to work. They feel like they’re being hunted.” Fear Replaces Festivity The parade’s cancellation is a devastating blow to many in Chicago’s Mexican American community. What began as a commemoration of the 1862 Battle of Puebla has evolved into a proud celebration of culture, history, and identity. But this year, many would-be attendees are choosing to stay home out of fear they could be detained or deported. Chicago, a designated sanctuary city, has long positioned itself as a place of protection for immigrants, regardless of legal status. However, recent threats from federal officials and reports of raids have shaken that sense of security. Community members are worried that the parade could become a trap, drawing out undocumented individuals and making them vulnerable to arrest. Escobar made it clear that the decision wasn’t about money or logistics. “We had enough sponsors. We could’ve made it work,” he said. “But it’s about safety. We don’t want people to come celebrate and end up in custody.” ICE Raids Spark Tension Across the City The Trump administration has made immigration enforcement a cornerstone of its policy agenda. Since the start of Trump’s second term, Chicago has faced increased scrutiny. According to organizers, ICE activity has stretched from the city into surrounding suburbs, creating a climate of fear that extends beyond just parade day. Tom Homan, Trump’s so-called “border czar” and former acting head of ICE, previously named Chicago as a top priority for enforcement actions. At a political event in December, Homan issued a stern warning to local leaders: support the raids or get out of the way. “If your mayor or governor won’t help, then don’t interfere,” he said. The threat felt real to many. In January, multiple reports surfaced of workplaces, stores, and even churches appearing unusually empty. In Joliet, a factory that typically sees 40 to 50 workers per shift had only 10 show up. Community members described eerily quiet streets and parking lots, even at places like Home Depot and Walmart that typically bustle with day laborers and shoppers. A History of Setbacks This isn’t the first time Chicago’s Cinco de Mayo Parade has been put on hold. It was cancelled from 2018 to 2022 due to the COVID-19 pandemic and internal disagreements between organizers and city officials. Last year’s parade also faced unexpected disruption due to a flare-up of gang violence that forced a reroute and ended in several arrests. Still, the hope had been that 2025 would mark a strong return. Instead, the parade is once again off the calendar—this time due to fears far more personal and immediate. Looking Ahead While there is no clear answer as to whether the parade will resume next year, organizers are cautiously optimistic—though they say it depends on what happens with federal immigration policy. “At this point, we don’t know what’s going to happen next year,” Escobar admitted. “If the deportations continue like this, we’ll have to make the same choice again.” For now, what was meant to be a joyful day of culture and community has turned into a painful reminder of the fear and uncertainty many immigrant families live with every day.
Disney May Hit Pause on Live-Action Remakes After ‘Snow White’ Stumbles at the Box Office
Disney’s strategy of turning its classic animated films into big-budget live-action spectacles might be running out of magic. The latest example — the 2025 remake of Snow White — has stumbled at the box office, raising questions inside and outside the studio about whether it’s time to pump the brakes on this remake formula. The Snow White remake, directed by Marc Webb and starring Rachel Zegler and Gal Gadot, was expected to be a major hit for Disney. Instead, it’s proving to be one of the studio’s biggest live-action flops in recent memory. With a reported production budget of $250 to $270 million and additional costs for marketing, the film needed to earn well over $600 million globally just to break even. As of its fifth weekend, it’s pulled in only about $183.4 million worldwide. That’s not just underwhelming — it’s a financial red flag. This isn't the first time a Disney live-action remake has fallen short, but Snow White is a standout because of its sheer scale and the expectations that surrounded it. Unlike Mulan (2020), which was released amid pandemic-related theater closures, Snow White had the advantage of a full theatrical run and global availability. Yet, it’s still trailing far behind in earnings, making it only the second Disney remake to not recoup its budget in theaters. A number of factors may have contributed to Snow White’s disappointing run. Controversy over the film’s creative direction, including reimagining the classic story’s dwarfs, political statements made by cast members, and its lukewarm reviews (39% on Rotten Tomatoes), have all likely played a role. Combined, they’ve created a perfect storm of negative buzz that likely hurt ticket sales. Disney's live-action remake boom started strong with Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland in 2010, which crossed the billion-dollar mark at the global box office. Hits like The Jungle Book, Beauty and the Beast, and The Lion King followed, all of which were billion-dollar earners. These successes cemented the live-action remake trend as a major part of Disney’s release strategy for over a decade. But not every remake has turned into box office gold. Dumbo (2019) and The Little Mermaid (2023) came close but ultimately fell short of their estimated break-even points. Still, most entries in the remake roster — including Aladdin (2019), which made over $1 billion — have been solid financial wins. In total, Disney’s live-action remakes have grossed over $8 billion at the global box office, compared to an estimated combined break-even cost of about $5.2 billion. That sounds profitable — and it is — but the margin narrows when you factor in the losses from streaming-exclusive titles like Pinocchio, Lady and the Tramp, and Peter Pan & Wendy, none of which brought in box office revenue and came with their own hefty production budgets. Looking ahead, Disney still has remakes in the pipeline, including Lilo & Stitch and a live-action version of Moana scheduled for 2026. But after the Snow White fallout, there’s speculation that the studio may reconsider how aggressively it pursues these projects — or at least how much money it’s willing to pour into them. The lesson from Snow White may be simple: nostalgia alone isn’t enough to guarantee box office success. Audience expectations have evolved, and the formula that worked a decade ago may now be in need of some serious rethinking. If Disney wants to continue reimagining its classics, it may need to scale back the budgets, get more selective with titles, and focus on innovation rather than repetition. Otherwise, the magic might keep fading — one remake at a time.
What’s Going On With Katie Price? Fans Voice Concern Online Over Her Changed Appearance
Katie Price has always been a familiar face in the spotlight, but her most recent photos have left fans alarmed. The 46-year-old former glamour model posted a series of selfies on Facebook that quickly drew attention — and not necessarily for the reasons she may have hoped. Her dramatically slimmer frame and tightly pulled facial features have sparked an outpouring of concern from longtime supporters. In the images, Katie is seen posing in skimpy teddy bear-themed pajamas that showed off her noticeably lean figure. Her long dark hair was slicked back and styled, and she wore a beaming smile. Despite the cheerful caption reading simply “Self care,” many fans weren’t convinced. “You don’t look well,” one fan commented. Others echoed similar sentiments, lamenting that the once “natural beauty” has become nearly “unrecognizable” after years of cosmetic procedures. “It’s a shame. You were so beautiful. Now it’s gone too far,” another commenter wrote. Katie, who has undergone at least six facelifts and is known for her love of plastic surgery, has been increasingly candid about her appearance. Despite online speculation that she may be using weight-loss injections like Ozempic, Katie insists her transformation has been natural. She attributes her recent weight loss to a revamped diet and exercise routine. Speaking with The Sun, she explained that cutting out carb-heavy foods like potatoes and pasta had made a significant difference. “They just puffed me up and made me fart,” she said bluntly. “Now that I eat better, I don’t feel bloated anymore.” Still, her explanation hasn’t done much to quiet the buzz online. Many are concerned that her physical changes may reflect deeper issues, with some urging her to take a break from social media and focus on her well-being. “Self care means being kind to your body and mind,” one user wrote, urging Katie to speak with a therapist and reevaluate her lifestyle. While her own transformation has dominated headlines, Katie is also facing emotional challenges at home. She recently opened up on Snapchat about her eldest son, Harvey, who is battling severe health complications due to his weight. The 22-year-old, who is blind, autistic, and has Prader-Willi syndrome — a rare genetic condition known to cause insatiable hunger — now weighs nearly 30 stone (over 400 pounds). “I’m so heartbroken and gutted,” Katie said in a candid video update. She shared that his increasing size has left him struggling to walk and dangerously close to suffering a heart attack. “It’s affecting his quality of life,” she added, describing how difficult it is to see him unable to do basic tasks like putting on shoes or going for a stroll. Katie has been working with doctors to get Harvey started on a course of Mounjaro — a weight-loss injection considered even more powerful than Ozempic. The aim is to help him reach a healthier weight and avoid life-threatening complications. “Obesity and his condition are a sad mix,” she said. “He doesn’t even fully understand what’s happening, but I’m going to help him through it.” Despite her own controversies and the scrutiny she faces, Katie has remained vocal about advocating for her son’s health. It’s a battle she says she won’t give up on. As for her own well-being, fans can only hope she’s receiving the same level of care and attention that she’s trying to provide for Harvey. For now, though, concern lingers — with many wondering whether Katie’s quest for reinvention has come at too high a price.
Don’t Say Please And Thank You To ChatGPT – It Can Cost Millions
If you’re in the habit of being polite to AI — tossing in a friendly “please” or “thank you” when chatting with ChatGPT — you might be surprised to learn it’s not just good manners; it’s expensive. According to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, those small courtesies are adding up to a surprisingly high cost for the company. Altman recently responded to a user on X (formerly Twitter) who asked whether politeness toward ChatGPT affected operating costs. His answer? Yes — and in a big way. He said that users’ tendency to pad their prompts with pleasantries is part of what’s costing OpenAI “tens of millions of dollars.” He even described the expense as “well spent,” though he left the comment open-ended with a cryptic “you never know.” It may sound like a joke, but there’s a serious explanation behind it. ChatGPT, like other AI chatbots, runs on massive neural networks called large language models (LLMs). These models are powered by an army of GPUs (graphics processing units), which are housed in energy-hungry data centers. Every interaction with ChatGPT — even short ones — requires significant computational power. Adding extra words, like “please” and “thank you,” means slightly more data to process, slightly more tokens to parse, and ultimately, slightly more power consumed per interaction. Now multiply that by billions. It’s estimated that a single prompt-response exchange can use up to 0.14 kilowatt-hours of energy — the same amount of electricity needed to keep 14 LED lightbulbs on for an hour. When scaled across millions (if not billions) of daily interactions, those little extras compound into a major energy burden. Globally, data centers already account for about 2% of electricity use. With the explosion of AI tools and growing demand for services like ChatGPT, energy use is poised to rise even further. As people engage with these systems more frequently — and more politely — the invisible costs grow. Still, not everyone agrees that politeness is a waste. Some experts argue that saying “please” and “thank you” to AI isn’t just for show. Kurtis Beavers, part of Microsoft’s Copilot design team, advocates for respectful prompts. He says that when users phrase their questions politely, the AI is more likely to respond in a friendly, cooperative tone — an interaction style that could be valuable in workplace settings and other professional environments. Microsoft’s WorkLab has echoed this sentiment, noting that “when it clocks politeness, it’s more likely to be polite back.” That means the tone you set with your words can influence the tone you receive — even from a machine. A 2024 survey found that 67% of Americans regularly use courteous language with AI. Among them, most say it’s just the right thing to do. Interestingly, a small but vocal group (about 12%) admitted they use manners “just in case” — jokingly referencing a future where robots might remember who was nice to them. But jokes aside, politeness toward AI is starting to raise questions. Is it worth the cost? Does being polite matter if the recipient isn’t a person? And can we afford to keep typing in extra words that may seem small but, on a global scale, carry a multi-million-dollar energy price tag? Altman seems to think it’s a price worth paying — at least for now. Whether that sentiment holds as energy demands rise and environmental concerns mount remains to be seen. So the next time you thank ChatGPT for helping with a recipe, resume, or research — just know that you’re participating in a modern dilemma: balancing digital etiquette with real-world impact.