Latest Influencer News in 2025
Trump’s Kennedy Center Visit for Les Misérables Met with Backlash, Boycott, and Boos
Former President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump faced a chilly reception on Wednesday night, June 11, as they attended the opening performance of Les Misérables at the Kennedy Center—a night intended to mark their first public appearance at the historic venue since Trump controversially took over its leadership. Instead, the event was marred by protests, boycotts, and an audience divided between applause and pointed boos. What was expected to be a celebratory return to the arts turned political well before curtain call. In February, Trump made headlines by installing himself as chairman of the Kennedy Center just days into his second term. The move was immediately criticized after he purged the institution’s previous leadership—many of whom were considered progressive in their approach to programming—and replaced them with loyal conservatives. He also appointed former ambassador and Trump ally Richard Grenell as president and interim director. Wednesday night’s performance of Les Misérables, one of Trump’s self-declared favorite musicals, became the latest battleground in the ongoing cultural tug-of-war. According to earlier reports, at least 10 of the show’s 12 lead actors chose not to perform that night in protest of Trump’s political intervention in the arts. Their absence was noticeable, with stand-ins stepping into roles normally carried by seasoned cast members. Outside the venue and within the concert hall itself, the reaction was swift. As the Trumps entered the Kennedy Center, a smattering of applause was quickly overwhelmed by loud booing. Social media platforms lit up with footage of the crowd’s reaction, including clips that captured theatergoers shouting “Shame!” as the former president walked to his seat. Vice President J.D. Vance and his wife, Usha Vance, who accompanied the Trumps, were also present. The couple had already encountered similar pushback from Kennedy Center patrons in March during a National Symphony Orchestra performance, and Wednesday’s crowd offered no warmer reception this time around. The cast protest had been brewing for weeks. According to CNN, performers were quietly given the option to abstain from the June 11 show if they felt uncomfortable. Many did. While the Kennedy Center did not publicly address the protest in advance, Grenell had issued a strong statement shortly after the performers' intentions were made public. "The Kennedy Center will no longer fund intolerance," Grenell wrote. “Any performer who isn’t professional enough to perform for patrons of all backgrounds... won’t be welcomed.” He also suggested that dissenting performers be named publicly so that producers would know not to hire them in the future—comments that critics immediately labeled as authoritarian. The controversy also reignited longstanding tensions over Trump’s political use of Les Misérables. The former president has played “Do You Hear the People Sing?” at various rallies since 2016, despite objections from the show’s creators. The musical’s producer, Sir Cameron Mackintosh, has previously condemned the unauthorized use of its music for political gain, noting that neither Trump nor his campaign received permission to feature it at events. Ironically, the song—an anthem sung by revolutionaries rising up against oppression—has often been seen as a curious and contradictory favorite for Trump, a figure many critics associate with authoritarian rhetoric. The atmosphere at Wednesday’s show reflected a deeper division over what role the arts should play in political discourse. Trump supporters in attendance praised the former president for appearing at a high-profile cultural event and pushing back against what they described as elitist gatekeeping in the arts. Detractors viewed the evening as a troubling encroachment of politics into creative spaces meant to be inclusive and independent. Whether Wednesday night was a one-off controversy or a preview of future showdowns at the Kennedy Center remains to be seen. But for many theatergoers, the message from the evening was loud and clear—even over the orchestral score: the arts, long a battleground for cultural identity, remain a space where politics are impossible to ignore.
Terry Moran Quickly Charts His Next Move After ABC Termination Over Trump Criticism Via X
Veteran journalist Terry Moran wasted no time outlining his future after being ousted from ABC News this week. On Wednesday, June 11, just a day after his sudden departure was confirmed by the network, Moran announced he would be launching a new platform on Substack, signaling his determination to keep reporting—even outside traditional media. “For almost 28 years, I was a reporter and anchor for ABC News. And as you may have heard, I’m not there anymore,” Moran said in a video posted to both X and Substack. “I’m here with you on Substack, this amazing space, and I can’t wait to get at it.” The announcement came in the wake of a post Moran made on X (formerly Twitter) criticizing former President Donald Trump and his close adviser Stephen Miller. In the since-deleted message, Moran described Miller as a man “richly endowed with the capacity for hatred” and likened Trump to a “world-class hater” who uses hatred for self-glorification. The post ignited controversy and quickly led to his suspension, followed by termination. ABC News issued a statement on Tuesday, June 10, confirming the end of its relationship with Moran. “We are at the end of our agreement with Terry Moran and have made the decision to not renew,” a spokesperson said. The network cited a violation of internal policies, noting that Moran’s post “did not meet our standards of objectivity, fairness, and professionalism.” Moran, however, made it clear that he has no plans to stay silent. In his video message, he emphasized a continued commitment to journalism and public dialogue. “I’ll be reporting and interviewing and just sharing with you—and hoping to hear from you as well,” he said. He also noted that while he is still “getting some stuff sorted out,” his new venture will soon be fully up and running. His move to Substack puts him in the growing group of journalists turning to independent publishing platforms to maintain editorial freedom. Substack allows writers to publish newsletters directly to subscribers, often unfiltered by corporate oversight. Moran’s decision suggests he will be embracing a more personal, possibly more opinionated form of journalism—something that had reportedly become a point of contention during his final days at ABC. The timing of Moran’s termination has sparked discussions about the state of journalistic freedom and media objectivity, especially in politically charged environments. His comments followed a tense period between the journalist and Trump, including a contentious interview during a special marking the first 100 days of Trump’s second term. That exchange reportedly included heated moments that underscored Moran’s critical stance on the administration. While some have applauded ABC for enforcing its code of conduct, others see Moran’s dismissal as a troubling sign for journalists trying to hold powerful figures accountable. For his part, Moran appears ready to continue challenging authority, even if it means doing so independently. “Journalism is more important now than ever,” he stated in his Substack announcement. “And I intend to do my part.” Moran’s quick pivot to Substack shows both resilience and a readiness to adapt to a changing media landscape. As traditional networks grapple with balancing editorial standards and freedom of expression, more journalists are carving out their own paths. For Moran, that path will now unfold outside the confines of network news—and likely with fewer filters. Though his tenure at ABC has come to an abrupt end, it’s clear that Moran views his new platform as a chance to begin again, on his own terms. Whether audiences follow him to Substack remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: he’s not done talking, and he’s not done reporting.
Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta AI Feed Is the Saddest Place on the Internet
Mark Zuckerberg’s grand vision for AI has taken a strange, and at times, unsettling turn. With the launch of Meta AI’s stand-alone chatbot app earlier this year, the company introduced what it called a fun and engaging tool for interacting with artificial intelligence. But at the heart of this app is a public “Discover” feed — a stream of user interactions with the AI that feels less like innovation and more like accidental oversharing on a massive scale. The Meta AI app allows users to ask questions, generate images, write poems, and engage in conversations with a chatbot. But unlike other popular AI platforms like ChatGPT or Google Gemini, Meta's app includes a social element: a feed of conversations and prompts that users have chosen — or think they've chosen — to make public. While the feature was pitched as a way to “explore how others are using AI,” the result is a feed filled with raw, sometimes deeply personal content that often seems like it was never meant to be shared. At first glance, the feed mostly appears harmless: AI-generated artwork, quirky requests for recipe suggestions, or a user asking for vacation tips. But dig a little deeper and it turns into something much more intimate — and uncomfortable. Users are openly asking the bot for legal advice, help writing letters to judges, health guidance, and even sharing emotional tributes to deceased loved ones. Some of the most personal posts include full names, email addresses, and even phone numbers. In one case, a man asked the bot to help write a letter to the court for a child custody dispute. Another asked for a good morning prayer, his voice trembling with vulnerability in an audio message that was inadvertently shared publicly. It’s easy to imagine these people had no idea they were broadcasting their conversations to the internet. Meta insists that chats aren’t public by default — users have to actively click “Share” and then “Post” to make a conversation appear in the Discover feed. A company spokesperson emphasized this multi-step process, suggesting users should be fully aware when they publish content. But given how many personal posts are showing up, it’s hard to believe everyone fully understands the consequences of clicking those buttons. The app doesn’t feel like a social network — it feels like a private space. That illusion may be exactly what’s making this situation so problematic. What’s more eerie is that some shared posts include audio recordings. These clips reveal conversations that often don’t seem meant for the AI at all — one recording captures a discussion between coworkers about their shift schedules. Another sounds like a classic “pocket dial” where Meta AI pipes in suggestions while two people chat about something unrelated. It’s not just awkward; it’s invasive. Adding to the strangeness is the fact that many posts display users’ actual Instagram or Facebook profiles. With just a few taps, you can often track down their real names and social media pages. It gives the whole feed the air of a surveillance window — less like browsing a tech feature and more like eavesdropping through someone’s diary. Meta AI's public feed might have been designed with good intentions — a space to showcase creativity and AI engagement. But in practice, it often resembles a confessional booth with the door left wide open. And instead of a priest, it’s Mark Zuckerberg’s algorithm listening in. There are, of course, plenty of lighthearted moments scattered throughout. Some people are clearly using the AI for entertainment: generating funny images, composing poems, or brainstorming party ideas. But these glimpses of levity only underscore the dissonance of seeing deeply personal, sometimes painful moments published for all to see. Zuckerberg has positioned Meta’s future around AI, with ambitious investments and goals to create a kind of digital superintelligence. But if the Discover feed is any indicator, the company still hasn’t figured out how to manage the human side of AI — the emotional messiness, the confusion, the very real risks of turning personal thoughts into public posts. For now, Meta AI’s feed feels less like a bold future of human-AI collaboration and more like a cautionary tale: what happens when you hand over your secrets to a chatbot without realizing the whole world might be watching.
Ex-Branch Davidian Survivor Offers Religious Warning to Justin Bieber: ‘Don’t Go Against the Pit in Your Stomach’
David Thibodeau, one of the few survivors of the deadly 1993 Branch Davidian siege in Waco, Texas, is sending a heartfelt warning to Justin Bieber amid growing concern about the singer’s association with the controversial Churchome community. In a recent interview, Thibodeau—who lived through one of the most infamous cult disasters in modern American history—shared advice with Bieber, encouraging the pop star to trust his instincts and remain cautious. “Don’t go against that pit in your stomach that says something is right or wrong,” Thibodeau said, adding that intuition is often the first line of defense against manipulation. Bieber, who has been affiliated with Churchome and its pastor, Judah Smith, for years, has reportedly seen his inner circle shrink. Sources suggest that several of Bieber’s former friends believe Churchome operates more like a cult than a traditional Christian church, prompting some to distance themselves from the star. While Thibodeau made it clear that Churchome is not as extreme as the Branch Davidians, he still raised red flags. “The Branch Davidians were a 24/7 operation. You couldn’t think for yourself, and everything was controlled. Churchome isn’t that—at least not yet,” he said. “But if leadership is telling you to only read scripture and avoid outside perspectives, that’s a serious concern.” Churchome, based in Washington state and Los Angeles, has drawn celebrity followers over the years, including Bieber and his wife, Hailey. It’s known for its modern approach to worship and celebrity-centric events, but accusations of spiritual manipulation and cult-like behavior have followed the church, especially in recent years. Thibodeau, who was only in his early 20s when he was drawn into the Branch Davidians, emphasized that age and maturity can be powerful tools. “Justin’s lucky he’s older now. When you’re younger, you’re easier to influence,” he explained. “Being more mature gives him an advantage—he can ask questions, research, and explore faith with a broader perspective.” In TMZ Investigates: What Happened to Justin Bieber?—a recent YouTube documentary—the pop star’s former friend Ryan Good shared that he left Churchome because he believed it had cult-like tendencies. Smith has denied all claims suggesting the church is a cult. Thibodeau warned that trying to confront Bieber aggressively about Churchome might backfire. “If friends come at him too hard, it’ll only push him closer to the church. That’s how these things work,” he said. “If you want to help someone, come from a place of compassion, not confrontation.” He also recommended that Bieber develop a daily gratitude practice, which helped him escape the lingering emotional grip of the cult he once called home. “When I left, I had to rebuild everything. I survived because I reminded myself every day of what I had to be thankful for,” Thibodeau said. “Justin might benefit from that too. Count your blessings. Anchor yourself in real life.” Thibodeau, who once described himself as a long-haired drummer seeking community, was one of only nine people who made it out alive from the fiery conclusion of the Waco siege. He’s since become a public speaker, musician, and author of Waco: A Survivor’s Story, which recounts the devastating 51-day standoff between the Branch Davidians and federal agents. As Bieber continues to navigate his spiritual path, Thibodeau’s message stands as a grounded and powerful reminder: remain curious, stay open, and never ignore the voice within. “Faith can be beautiful, but blind faith can be dangerous,” Thibodeau said. “No matter how famous or faithful you are, you still have to think for yourself.”
Long Island School Nurse Goes Viral After Wearing ‘ICE’ Jacket on Superhero Day
A nurse at Northwest Elementary School in Amityville, Long Island, has been reassigned after allegedly wearing a jacket with the letters “ICE” emblazoned on the back during a schoolwide “Superhero Day” celebration. The incident sparked swift backlash from parents, teachers, and the wider school community, prompting the Amityville Union Free School District to launch an internal investigation. The controversial attire reportedly made its appearance on Wednesday, coinciding with a moving-up ceremony for kindergartners and a themed dress-up day encouraging students and staff to portray their favorite superheroes. Instead, many interpreted the nurse’s outfit as a political statement rather than a lighthearted or inspirational tribute. The acronym “ICE” is widely associated with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, a federal agency that has drawn intense criticism in recent years over its enforcement tactics and role in immigration-related raids. For some families—particularly those from immigrant backgrounds—the letters evoke fear and trauma, not heroism. “The Amityville Union Free School District is aware of an allegation involving a district staff member who affixed an acronym to their clothing that was perceived by some members of the school community as offensive or inappropriate in the educational setting,” the district said in a statement issued Wednesday. “Upon learning of the situation, the staff member was immediately reassigned to a non-school setting pending a full review.” School officials reiterated their commitment to maintaining an inclusive environment, stating that their “top priority is to ensure that our schools remain safe, inclusive, and welcoming spaces for all students and families.” While the district did not officially confirm the letters on the jacket, Nakia Wolfe, president of the Amityville Teachers’ Association, told Newsday the clothing displayed the word “ICE.” Wolfe confirmed the individual involved is a nurse employed at Northwest Elementary School. “Why would you come into a setting of learning to make any type of political stance like that?” Wolfe said. “It’s just completely inappropriate.” The incident also upset other school staff. Northwest Elementary teacher Hilda Brown told Newsday that the nurse’s outfit choice was clearly visible during school hours and notably out of place on a day designed to uplift and inspire students. Parents picking up their children from school expressed outrage and disbelief. “That’s utterly disgusting. This is the world we’re living in now?” said parent Marquise Gordon, speaking to News 12 Long Island. Another parent, Jackie Sauls, said, “People are already fearful as it is. There’s no right in that.” The timing of the incident has only intensified emotions. Nationwide, tensions surrounding immigration enforcement have flared in recent weeks. In New York City, an anti-ICE demonstration in Lower Manhattan led to 86 arrests just one day before the Long Island incident. On the island itself, there has been an uptick in reported ICE activity, with arrests in Glen Cove and sightings in towns like Bellport and Riverhead. According to Glen Cove police, federal agents detained multiple individuals near a train station Wednesday morning. A spokesperson for ICE told News 12 Long Island that its New York City division is “actively investigating immigration crimes throughout the five boroughs, Long Island, and the lower Hudson Valley.” The nurse's apparent choice of attire, whether intentional or not, has struck a nerve in a region where immigrant families make up a significant portion of the school population. Critics argue that bringing such a symbol into an elementary school—especially under the guise of celebrating heroism—was both insensitive and potentially harmful to young students. The district has not announced whether the nurse will face further disciplinary action but confirmed that the investigation is ongoing. For now, the employee remains reassigned away from school grounds. As the story circulates through news outlets and social media, many are watching how the district chooses to respond—and how schools balance personal expression with the responsibility to foster supportive, inclusive learning environments.
Viral: Who Is Vishwashkumar Ramesh? Air India Crash’ Lone Survivor
Tragedy struck India’s skies on Thursday morning when an Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner crashed shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad, killing 241 of the 242 people on board. Authorities and rescue teams raced to the site of the wreckage, which scattered across the grounds of a nearby medical college. The flight, designated AI171, was headed to London with 242 people aboard — 169 Indian citizens, 53 British nationals, seven Portuguese nationals, and one Canadian, along with 10 cabin crew members and two pilots. The sole survivor was identified as Vishwashkumar Ramesh, a British national from Leicester. Officials confirmed that Ramesh is receiving treatment at a hospital, with India’s Home Minister Amit Shah saying he had personally met with him. “We received the good news that one passenger survived,” Shah said. “I have personally met this survivor.” Footage shared on social media showed Ramesh walking, dazed, away from the wreckage. His brother, Nayan Kumar Ramesh, told the BBC, “He has no idea how he survived.” The crash occurred just minutes after takeoff, with data from Flightradar24 indicating the aircraft only reached an altitude of 625 feet before disappearing from radar. It ultimately crashed into a dining facility at a local medical college, killing at least five students who were on campus at the time, according to Minakshi Parikh, the college’s dean. Aviation authorities said a mayday call had been made, but no further communication was received from the pilots. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) confirmed that one of the two black boxes — crucial for determining the cause of the crash — had been recovered. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner, registered as VT-ANB, was first delivered to Air India in 2014. It had flown earlier that day from New Delhi and had completed recent flights to international destinations including Paris, Melbourne, Frankfurt, and Tokyo. Thursday’s crash marks the first total loss of a Boeing 787 since the aircraft’s introduction in 2011 — and its first fatal crash. The incident sent Boeing’s stock tumbling nearly 5%, closing the day at $203.75. Analysts from Morgan Stanley said the crash “derails the positive momentum on Boeing’s stock,” which had been up about 25% earlier in the year. Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg expressed condolences and said the company was standing by to assist with investigations. “Our deepest condolences go out to the loved ones of the passengers and crew on board Air India Flight 171, as well as everyone affected in Ahmedabad,” Ortberg said. Air India’s CEO, Campbell Wilson, issued a video statement vowing full support for families and authorities. “We understand the public wants answers,” he said, “but anything we report must be accurate and not speculative. We owe that to everyone involved.” Prime Minister Narendra Modi posted on X, formerly Twitter: “The tragedy in Ahmedabad has stunned and saddened us. It is heartbreaking beyond words. In this sad hour, my thoughts are with everyone affected.” The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board and British accident investigators announced they were sending teams to India to assist. Meanwhile, experts are analyzing early clues from photos suggesting that the aircraft's landing gear may not have retracted. “If the gear was still down, then that would suggest that something is untoward,” said Alastair Rosenschen, a former British Airways pilot. Aviation law expert Alan Tan noted the incident could be the “costliest insurance claim in Indian aviation history.” He added that compensation for the five victims on the ground would be handled under Indian domestic law, as India is not a party to international conventions protecting ground victims. For the families of those who perished on board, compensation would likely be governed by the Montreal Convention of 1999, which holds airlines responsible for passenger deaths or injuries. Air India, which has been undergoing a massive transformation since the Tata Group took control in 2022, now faces a renewed crisis. Just last year, the airline placed a record-breaking order for 470 new aircraft. Rebuilding public trust will be a steep climb. “This crash has shaken confidence,” said Tan, “but as history has shown, transparency and accountability can help airlines weather such tragedies.” For now, investigators continue their work as the world watches, hoping for clarity — and some measure of justice for the 241 lives lost.
TikTok Photographer Sherif Shama Denies Harassment Allegations Following Viral Accusation
Sherif Shama, a popular TikTok street photographer known for his candid portraits in Milan, is at the center of controversy after a woman publicly accused him of harassment during a trip to Italy. The woman, TikTok user Kenzie Swaine, claimed Shama followed her to her Airbnb and physically intimidated her — an allegation the photographer firmly denies. Shama, who has amassed more than 1.5 million followers on TikTok for his spontaneous photography of strangers on the streets of Milan, addressed the accusations in a TikTok story on Friday. “Fake story,” he wrote. “If you looking to have views or money there’s different ways for that. People believe you because they didn’t listen to my side. Shame on you.” He also posted a clip of their initial encounter, which he says took place on June 18, 2024. In the video, Shama can be seen snapping a photo of Swaine, who later commented under the video: “AHHHHH thank you I had so much fun with this.” Shama used the comment to challenge the validity of Swaine’s claims, suggesting that her behavior during and after the interaction contradicted her story. But Swaine’s account of what happened paints a much darker picture. In a TikTok video that has since gone viral, she described her experience with Shama as “very traumatic.” She said the trouble began after they reconnected the night after their initial photo session — this time without his camera. According to her, after a drink and a walk through Milan, Shama refused to leave her alone despite her repeated objections. https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSkaA1bqR/ “No, but I like you,” she recalled him saying as he insisted on following her back to her lodging. Swaine said she spent nearly 45 minutes trying to get away before calling an Uber. Once the vehicle arrived, she said Shama forced himself into the car. “I’m f**king panicking at this point,” she said, describing how the driver did not intervene while she cried and asked for help. Upon arriving at her Airbnb, she claimed things escalated further. According to Swaine, Shama physically pushed the apartment gate into her as she tried to get inside, preventing her from breathing properly. “We’re literally pushing and pulling on the gate on opposite sides for at least 45 seconds,” she said. Eventually, she managed to lock the gate and shut him out. “He looked at me with the most sinister eyes, then just sat there and eventually walked off.” Swaine has denied that her account was motivated by a desire for fame or money. In a follow-up video, she addressed Shama’s rebuttal and the criticism she received. “You think I want my claim to fame to be the girl that has zero survival instincts?” she said. She also stated she would be donating all income generated from her TikTok videos in June — even those unrelated to the Shama story — to charity. “Karma’s a b**** and it’s coming for you,” she added. In the wake of the allegations, Shama initially turned off comments and deleted negative remarks on his social media. However, he has since reopened his comment sections, allowing followers to weigh in on both sides of the controversy. Despite the backlash, he has stood firm in denying all claims, asserting that the interaction has been misrepresented. As of now, no legal action has been reported in connection to the incident. Shama has not issued any further public statement beyond his initial videos, and efforts to reach him for comment have been unsuccessful. The incident has sparked heated debate across TikTok and other platforms, with users divided between support for Kenzie’s courage in coming forward and skepticism over the conflicting narratives. The case serves as a stark reminder of how social media can amplify personal disputes and put digital creators under intense public scrutiny.
YouTuber Accused of Killing Rival and His Wife in Livestream Shooting on Las Vegas Strip
A heated social media rivalry turned deadly Sunday night when a YouTuber allegedly gunned down a fellow content creator and his wife during a livestream near the Bellagio fountains on the Las Vegas Strip. The shocking double homicide, which unfolded in front of bystanders and was partially captured on camera, has rocked the online creator community. Las Vegas police say the suspected shooter, 41-year-old Manuel Ruiz, turned himself in early Monday morning at a police station in nearby Henderson. He is now in custody on suspicion of murdering 44-year-old Rodney Finley and his wife, 43-year-old Tanisha Finley. Officers on patrol along South Las Vegas Boulevard heard gunfire around 10:30 p.m. Sunday and rushed to the scene near the Bellagio. There, they found the couple lying on the sidewalk with multiple gunshot wounds. Both were pronounced dead at the scene. According to investigators, the shooting was likely motivated by a “conflict over social media.” Police confirmed that the parties involved knew each other and had a documented history of animosity online. Rodney Finley, known online as Finny Da Legend, was a Las Vegas-based YouTuber who regularly posted livestreams and content about life on the Strip. Over the past year, he had used his platform to speak out against Ruiz, also known on YouTube as SinCity-Manny. In a video from March 2024, Finley accused Ruiz and his partner of issuing copyright strikes against his channel. The video, titled “Look at what Sin City Family (Pmanny & Julie) Did to me,” featured screenshots of what appeared to be an email from YouTube notifying Finley of a copyright claim. Too many such violations can result in the termination of a creator’s channel. The rivalry appeared to deepen in recent months, with fans of both creators trading jabs online. As of Monday morning, Ruiz’s YouTube channel had been taken down, and the livestream from Sunday night was also removed. However, portions of the stream were widely shared on other platforms before its deletion. The livestream reportedly showed Finley and his wife walking along the Strip with viewers tuning in, when chaos suddenly erupted. Screams could be heard, and the camera shook violently as gunshots rang out. The shooter never appeared on screen, but witnesses described seeing a man approach the couple and open fire without warning. According to a police report obtained by the Las Vegas Review-Journal, Ruiz told investigators that the shooting was in self-defense. He allegedly claimed the two men had a longstanding “rivalry” and that he felt threatened during their unexpected encounter. He also said he had no idea Finley and his wife were livestreaming from that location. The incident has left the YouTube community in shock, raising questions about how far online feuds can go in real life. Friends and fans of the Finleys have expressed their grief and disbelief on social media, remembering the couple as kind and deeply loved members of the Las Vegas creator scene. “This was senseless. Rodney always tried to lift people up with his content,” said one friend in a comment under a tribute video. “He didn’t deserve this, and neither did Tanisha.” Authorities have not confirmed whether any charges have been formally filed against Ruiz, but he remains in custody pending further investigation. The Clark County District Attorney’s office is expected to review the case and determine whether to pursue murder charges or accept Ruiz’s claim of self-defense. The tragedy has renewed calls for greater accountability and moderation on platforms like YouTube, where interpersonal disputes can sometimes spiral out of control. While online rivalries are nothing new, the deadly outcome of this one has sent a chilling message to creators everywhere: the line between online drama and real-world violence can blur in the worst possible ways.
J-Hope’s Finale Concert Fuels Speculation of Full BTS Reunion on 12th Anniversary
J-Hope, the ever-energetic dancer and rapper of BTS, has announced the final shows of his HOPE ON THE STAGE world tour—and fans believe these concerts could mark a historic moment in K-pop: the reunion of all seven BTS members. Set to take place on July 13 and 14, 2025, in Goyang, South Korea, the timing of the encore performances couldn’t be more symbolic. July 13 marks the 12th anniversary of BTS’ debut, and the overlap between J-Hope’s finale and the band’s milestone has sent fans into a frenzy. Whispers of an OT7 (all seven members) reunion are circulating across social media, with ARMYs worldwide expressing cautious optimism that the group may reunite for the first time in years. Adding fuel to the fire was BTS’ recent fan initiative—asking followers to answer 12 personal questions about their journey with the band. The campaign, launched on Weverse, mirrored the 12-year anniversary and hinted at something special brewing behind the scenes. While no official statement from BigHit Music or BTS has confirmed a reunion, fans are taking the combination of clues as reason to believe. J-Hope has also been subtly teasing the idea. In interviews and social media posts, he’s expressed a deep longing to share the stage with his bandmates again. The emotional weight of ending his solo tour on BTS’ debut date feels intentional. And with most of the group expected to have completed their mandatory military service by July, the chances of a group reunion—no matter how brief—are better than ever. Still, one possible roadblock remains: SUGA. The rapper-producer, who enlisted separately from the rest of the group, is reportedly scheduled to complete his service on July 21—just a week after the concerts. However, fans remain hopeful that he may be granted early leave to appear, as South Korean military policy sometimes allows for accumulated vacation days toward the end of service. This has sparked a wave of hopeful posts online. Hashtags like #OT7July13 and #YoongiComeBack are trending across platforms, as fans ask if SUGA might make a surprise appearance. “Just imagine all seven of them walking out together on that stage,” one fan tweeted. “That would be the most healing moment of the decade.” Whether or not all members can physically be present, the emotional significance of J-Hope’s final tour dates cannot be overstated. His solo tour has taken fans through his growth as an artist and individual, and concluding it on the anniversary of BTS’ formation brings his journey full circle. For many ARMYs, J-Hope's choice of dates feels like a quiet tribute to the bond he shares with his bandmates and their loyal fandom. Global interest in the Goyang encore is skyrocketing. The concerts will be streamed live, ensuring that even international fans who can’t attend in person won’t miss a moment. The event promises not only a high-energy performance but potentially a glimpse into what the future holds for BTS once all members are back from military duty. In a year filled with whispers of new beginnings and long-awaited returns, this two-night finale may become one of the most-watched BTS moments ever. Even if a full-stage reunion doesn’t happen, the possibility alone has rekindled excitement within the fandom. Until July 13 arrives, fans will continue to wait, hope, and speculate. Whether it’s six members on stage or all seven, the sentiment remains the same: BTS’ legacy isn’t just about their music—it's about the unbreakable connection between them and the millions of hearts they’ve touched.
No, Your Costco Card Won’t Get You Through Airport Security, TSA Warns
A viral joke has once again stirred confusion at airport security: can your Costco membership get you through TSA checkpoints? The short answer, according to the Transportation Security Administration, is a firm “no.” And they’re not amused—well, maybe just a little. On June 4, the TSA’s Pacific division posted a light-hearted but direct message on X: “We love hotdogs & rotisserie chickens as much as the next person but please stop telling people their Costco card counts as a REAL ID because it absolutely does not.” The comment was clearly meant to shut down a growing misconception that a Costco card can somehow stand in for a federally approved identification document. While the post got plenty of laughs online, the agency says the confusion can cause real issues at airport checkpoints. The Costco Card Myth That Won’t Die This isn’t the first time the rumor has circulated. According to TSA spokesperson Lorie Dankers, this Costco-as-ID myth pops up every so often, especially when large travel periods approach. “People try to hand over their Costco membership at the airport and get surprised when it’s not accepted,” Dankers told SFGate. “It’s a membership card, not a government-issued ID.” In fact, the recurring gag has made enough rounds that the TSA felt compelled to speak up—again—before it leads to more missed flights or frustrated travelers. Real ID Deadline Has Passed As of May 7, all travelers flying within the U.S. need to present a Real ID or another form of federally accepted identification to get past security. The Real ID Act, passed in 2005 and delayed several times, finally took full effect this year. The new standard requires states to issue ID cards that meet stricter verification rules. Real IDs are typically marked with a star in the upper corner. Don’t have one yet? You’ll need to bring a valid passport or one of several other approved documents. TSA officers won’t—and can’t—make exceptions. What Will Get You Through Security? Here’s a breakdown of documents TSA will accept for domestic flights: A Real ID-compliant driver’s license or ID card U.S. passport or passport card DHS trusted traveler cards (Global Entry, NEXUS, SENTRI, FAST) Military IDs and Department of Defense credentials State-issued Enhanced Driver’s License (EDL) Permanent resident cards (green cards) Tribal-issued photo IDs Employment Authorization Cards (Form I-766) Transportation Worker Identification Credentials (TWIC) U.S. Merchant Mariner Credentials Veteran Health ID Cards (VHIC) Certain foreign government-issued passports Notice anything missing? That’s right—no retail or membership cards, no matter how official they might look. Why This Matters for Travelers While TSA’s social media team may have leaned into humor to get their message across, the issue is serious. Showing up with the wrong ID means delays, missed flights, and sometimes even being denied access to the terminal entirely. And the Costco confusion is just one example. Every year, TSA officers encounter travelers who think work badges, student IDs, or other non-government documents will work. “They may have photos and names, but they’re not verified or secure in the way federal IDs are,” Dankers noted. Costco’s Role in All This? None. For the record, Costco has never claimed its membership cards double as travel documents. The retailer’s iconic plastic card is designed for bulk shopping, not boarding planes. So while it might get you access to cheap gas, discounted electronics, and endless samples, don’t expect it to get you through TSA screening. Save the Chicken, Bring the Right ID If you’re planning a trip, double-check what’s in your wallet before heading to the airport. And while your Costco card might help you save on vacation supplies, it won’t help you get past security. Leave it at home—unless you’re picking up dinner on the way.
Why Malia Obama Dropped Her Last Name and Is Now Malia Ann
When Malia Obama debuted her short film The Heart at Sundance in 2024, the buzz wasn’t just about her directorial work. Viewers were quick to notice a subtle but striking change: her name in the credits read Malia Ann—no mention of “Obama.” The decision to drop one of the most recognizable surnames in American politics immediately raised eyebrows. Was she rejecting her famous lineage? Making a statement about independence? Or was it something more personal? Now, with her mother Michelle Obama finally breaking her silence on the matter, we have a clearer view of the motivation behind the name change—and it has nothing to do with rebellion and everything to do with identity. ‘She Wants to Do This on Her Own’ During a candid appearance on the Sibling Revelry podcast, Michelle Obama admitted the move surprised the family at first, but she ultimately respects Malia’s decision. According to the former First Lady, Malia’s goal was simple: to be recognized for her work, not her last name. “She’s not running away from us,” Michelle said. “She just wants people to see her creativity first, not her family background.” Michelle explained that both Malia and her younger sister Sasha have grown up acutely aware of their parents' global visibility—and the assumptions that come with it. Dropping "Obama" was Malia’s way of stepping outside that shadow, at least professionally. “She’s saying, ‘Let me show you who I am without the weight of being an Obama,’” Michelle said. A Name That Still Honors Family While many speculated that removing “Obama” was a move to distance herself from the political legacy of her parents, the truth is more layered. “Ann” isn’t just a random middle name—it’s a tribute to her paternal grandmother, Ann Dunham, who passed away in 1995. Rather than distancing herself from her roots, Malia is choosing to honor a quieter part of her family story. Ann Dunham was a cultural anthropologist who influenced much of Barack Obama’s worldview. Naming herself after her is both a personal and intentional act—one that reclaims legacy on her own terms. Barack’s Reaction? Classic Dad Humor Barack Obama, ever the cool dad, took the news with a sense of humor. Speaking on The Pivot Podcast in 2024, he recalled teasing Malia after learning of her plan. “I told her, ‘You know people will still figure out who you are, right?’” he laughed. But like Michelle, Barack expressed pride in his daughter’s desire to forge her own path without leaning on the Obama name. “They’ve always wanted to earn it. Malia and Sasha are very clear—they don’t want handouts, and they don’t want assumptions.” The Cost of Growing Up in the Spotlight For most young adults, early adulthood is a time to experiment and explore identity. For the Obama daughters, that journey unfolded under a microscope. Michelle reflected on that challenge. “They wanted to try new things, test boundaries,” she said. “But doing that when everyone’s watching is hard. We had to give them more space than I was ever given growing up.” That freedom seems to be paying off. Sasha is pursuing her own interests, and Malia is developing a quiet but promising career in film—one that appears determined to speak for itself. What’s Next for Malia Ann? With her first film under her belt and a new identity in place, Malia Ann is setting the tone for the next chapter of her life. While the name change might have confused some, it’s quickly becoming clear: this isn’t about abandoning family—it’s about stepping into her own spotlight. And with parents like Michelle and Barack cheering her on—whether she uses their last name or not—it’s safe to say she’s got all the support she needs to make her own mark.
Johnny Somali Could Face 31 Years in Prison in South Korea Over Deepfake Sex Crimes and Disruptive Behavior
Johnny Somali, a controversial internet personality known for his disruptive live-streaming antics, may be facing a grim future. The streamer, whose real name is Ramsey Khalid Ismael, could be sentenced to up to 31 years in prison in South Korea after being charged with multiple offenses, including deepfake sex crimes and obstruction of business. The charges stem from a deepfake video shared in May 2025 that depicted Somali kissing popular Korean streamer BongBong. In South Korea, the creation or distribution of deepfake content—especially involving non-consensual sexual imagery—is considered a serious sex crime. Authorities have filed two separate charges related to deepfakes, with each carrying a maximum penalty of 10.5 years, amounting to 21 years in total if convicted on both counts. This isn’t the first time Somali has found himself in hot water abroad. His history of traveling to different countries to antagonize locals for livestream content has gained him notoriety online—and increasing legal attention. Prior to arriving in South Korea, he had already been banned from Japan and Israel due to similar disruptive behavior. A Pattern of Provocation In South Korea, Somali's confrontational tactics escalated. He was frequently seen harassing residents, shouting offensive comments, and deliberately interrupting businesses and other streamers during their broadcasts. In one particularly shocking moment, he was punched and knocked out on stream by a former Korean Navy SEAL. Although the veteran was fined for assault, the incident underscored the public frustration with Somali's actions. Authorities began closely monitoring his movements, leading to formal investigations and, eventually, serious charges. More Than Just Deepfakes In addition to the sex crime allegations, Somali faces charges for obstructing business, which adds to his legal peril. South Korean law treats disruption of business—especially with intent—as a criminal offense. When combined with the deepfake counts, the total sentence could reach 31 years in prison. What’s more, Somali is also reportedly under investigation for other potential crimes, though they have not yet resulted in formal charges. These include threats to spread HIV, alleged violations of anti-terrorism laws, and even the promotion of North Korean propaganda. Authorities have remained tight-lipped about the progress of these investigations, but they could add to his already long list of legal woes. From Streamer to Inmate? While Somali’s controversial content has earned him both criticism and a following online, legal experts say South Korea’s justice system is unlikely to take his behavior lightly. The country has strict laws around digital sex crimes, especially in the wake of public outcry over similar offenses involving non-consensual media. Legal analysts believe his deepfake charges alone could be enough to keep him imprisoned for more than two decades. If additional charges are filed and convictions secured, his prison term could extend well beyond that. His legal team is expected to fight the charges vigorously, possibly arguing that the videos were fabricated or that Somali did not intend harm. But with growing evidence and public pressure, a favorable outcome seems uncertain. Fallout and Financial Trouble Reports have also surfaced suggesting that Somali is struggling financially. Local media outlets claim he’s run out of money and has begged supporters online for help with legal fees and living expenses. This financial strain could further impact his ability to mount a strong defense. Despite being a self-proclaimed “content king,” Johnny Somali's brand of provocation may have finally caught up with him. The South Korean legal system is making it clear that such behavior won’t be tolerated—and the consequences may be more severe than he ever anticipated. As the court proceedings continue, all eyes will be on what could become one of the most high-profile cases involving a foreign streamer in South Korea’s recent history.
Transgender Influencer Lilly Tino Faces Legal Backlash After Recording in Disney World Bathrooms
A transgender social media influencer is at the center of a growing controversy after filming content inside women’s restrooms at Walt Disney World. Lilly Tino, who is known for her provocative online persona, recorded herself rating bathrooms across the Disney parks—with guests visibly present in the background of her photos and videos. The incident has sparked widespread criticism and potential legal consequences. Contino posted the videos to her social media accounts, where she reviewed the restrooms' cleanliness and design. However, several viewers quickly pointed out that other female guests were seen in the background of the footage, with their faces unblurred and their privacy unprotected. Now, some of the women captured in the videos are reportedly “exploring legal options,” and legal experts say Contino may have violated state laws in Florida. Civil Lawsuit on the Horizon? According to several posts circulating online, at least a few women featured in the videos are considering civil lawsuits. While criminal charges are possible, legal analysts suggest a civil case for invasion of privacy and emotional distress would be more likely. “It’s not just about being filmed,” one commentator wrote. “It’s about being filmed without your knowledge or consent in a bathroom, one of the most private places someone can be.” Online outrage has quickly followed. Many users are calling for Disney to permanently ban Contino from all its parks. As of now, Disney has not released any public statement about the matter. Legal Trouble Under Florida Law Contino’s actions could be in violation of at least one Florida law. Florida Statute 810.145 makes it illegal to record or broadcast someone in a bathroom or changing facility without their knowledge and consent. This statute classifies the offense as a felony, carrying penalties of up to five years in prison and a $5,000 fine. Additionally, in 2023, Florida passed the Facility Requirements Based on Sex Act, which mandates that individuals use restrooms and locker rooms based on their sex assigned at birth in certain facilities. While it’s unclear whether Disney World bathrooms fall under this law, some right-wing groups have already begun pressuring Florida Governor Ron DeSantis to investigate Contino for potentially violating the act. Contino has not responded to requests for comment as of this writing. A Pattern of Controversial Behavior This isn’t the first time Lilly Contino has made headlines at a Disney park. In May, she uploaded a video in which a Disney cast member accidentally misgendered her. Contino demanded a refund for her meal, which the cast member provided along with an apology. While some praised Contino for advocating for herself, others criticized the way she publicized the incident and accused her of exploiting an honest mistake for clout. In a separate incident last year, Contino filmed herself at Disneyland using theme park snacks—specifically a corndog and cake pops—to describe male anatomy in reference to her gender-affirming surgery. That video sparked considerable backlash from parents, who said it was inappropriate to discuss such topics in a family-oriented park where children were present. What Happens Next? Contino has not made any new public posts regarding the bathroom incident, though legal experts believe she may soon be forced to respond, particularly if lawsuits begin to materialize. “Filming in restrooms, especially when others are present, is a clear privacy concern,” said one attorney familiar with Florida’s privacy laws. “Even influencers must abide by state and federal laws when filming content.” With Disney currently remaining silent and guests pushing for further investigation, Contino’s future at the theme parks—and on social media—hangs in the balance. If charges are filed or lawsuits proceed, the case could have broader implications for how influencers film in public and semi-private spaces. For now, what began as a series of bathroom reviews may end in legal fallout that affects not only Contino but the influencer space at large.
Brooke Shields Explains Why She Interrupted Meghan Markle During SXSW Panel: “It Was Too Precious”
Brooke Shields is shedding light on a moment that caught the attention of many at the 2024 SXSW festival—a panel discussion featuring herself, Meghan Markle, and journalist Katie Couric. In a new podcast interview, Shields explained why she felt compelled to interrupt the Duchess of Sussex mid-conversation, admitting she feared the tone of the talk was becoming “too precious” for the audience. Speaking on India Hicks’s podcast, Shields recounted how the panel kicked off with Couric asking Markle about her advocacy work. Markle began telling the well-known story of how, at age 11, she wrote to Procter & Gamble about a sexist dish soap commercial that stated, “Women all over America are fighting greasy pots and pans.” After Markle’s letter campaign, the company changed the slogan to the more inclusive “People all over America.” While many admire the anecdote as an early sign of Markle’s passion for gender equality, Shields said she was concerned it wasn’t striking the right tone for the crowd. “She starts telling a story about how when she was 11—and she keeps saying, ‘Well, when I was 11…,’” Shields said. “I was like, they’re not going to want to sit here for 45 minutes and listen to anybody be precious or serious.” Trying to lighten the mood, Shields decided to chime in—though she said she was careful not to come off as rude. “I go, ‘Excuse me, I’m so sorry, I’ve got to interrupt you there for one minute,’” Shields recalled. “I was trying not to be rude, but I wanted to be funny because it was so serious.” Her way of shifting the tone? A cheeky reference to her controversial role in the 1978 film Pretty Baby. “I just want to give everybody here a context as to how we’re different,” she said at the time. “When I was 11, I was playing a prostitute.” According to Shields, the audience erupted with laughter. “The place went insane,” she said on the podcast. “The room just felt more relaxed after that.” Shields’s comment was clearly meant to draw a contrast between her early life in the entertainment industry and Markle’s childhood experience with activism. While Markle has often been praised for her efforts to promote gender equality from a young age, Shields wanted to inject some levity into what she felt was a very earnest conversation. Despite the interruption, there doesn't appear to be any lingering tension between the women. Shields didn't express any animosity, and her tone throughout the podcast remained light and respectful. This isn’t the first time Markle’s dish soap story has made headlines. The anecdote has long been a foundational part of her public narrative—especially since becoming a royal and launching her Archetypes podcast, which focused on deconstructing the labels placed on women. India Hicks, the podcast host and goddaughter of King Charles III, didn’t appear to take offense either, nor did she comment negatively on the interruption. The conversation focused more on how panel discussions are received by live audiences and the importance of keeping things engaging. Shields, who’s known for blending humor and vulnerability in interviews, made it clear that her intent was to keep the energy of the event lively, not to undercut Markle’s advocacy. In the end, both women brought their own powerful stories to the stage—Markle’s rooted in activism, and Shields’s steeped in pop culture history. And while their paths have been wildly different, their SXSW interaction highlighted the blend of seriousness and humor that panels like these often need. For many in the audience, it was a memorable moment—and for Shields, it was a calculated move to keep things balanced. “I was just trying to read the room,” she said.
Doctors Raise Alarm Over Viral Skincare Trend Harming Young Girls — Some as Young as 7
An alarming number of young girls are getting swept up in a dangerous online beauty craze — and doctors say it could be hurting their skin and their self-esteem. A new peer-reviewed study from Northwestern University is raising red flags over the growing number of girls, some as young as 7, adopting elaborate skincare routines they discover on TikTok. Many of these routines include powerful active ingredients meant for adults, and doctors warn they may be doing more harm than good. “We’re seeing girls use products that cause burning, redness, and even allergic reactions,” said Dr. Molly Hales, the study’s lead author and a board-certified dermatologist. “It’s concerning not just from a medical perspective, but also from a mental health one.” Beauty at a Cost The study analyzed 100 popular TikTok videos after researchers created accounts posing as 13-year-olds to gain insight into what the platform recommends. What they found was disturbing: tween and teen girls are routinely layering up to a dozen products on their skin — and paying a steep price for it. Researchers estimate the average cost of these skincare regimens is $168 per month, with some spending over $500. Many of the routines include cleansers, toners, serums, masks, moisturizers, and eye creams, with an average of 11 active ingredients per video. One viral video showed a young girl applying 10 different products in under six minutes. Midway through the clip, she began complaining of a burning sensation. By the end, her skin was visibly irritated. “This is a classic case of too much, too soon,” said Dr. Tara Lagu, senior author of the study. “These products aren’t just expensive—they’re often inappropriate for developing skin.” A Dangerous Mix According to the study, the skin irritation many girls experience stems from combining ingredients that aren’t meant to be layered or repeating the same ingredient in multiple products without realizing it. For instance, using multiple products containing retinol or salicylic acid can cause the skin barrier to break down. Additionally, only 26% of the skincare routines studied included sunscreen—despite the fact that many active ingredients increase sun sensitivity. Without sun protection, these young users may be setting themselves up for long-term skin damage and an increased risk of developing conditions like allergic contact dermatitis. Unrealistic Standards, Real-World Impact Beyond the physical health risks, experts worry about the psychological effects of the trend. TikTok’s beauty content often promotes ideals of clear, glowing, and lighter-toned skin. The Northwestern study found that many top-performing videos emphasized achieving a “brighter” or “more radiant” complexion, fueling concerns about colorism and beauty bias. “We’re teaching girls that they have to look a certain way to be accepted,” Hales said. “There’s a lot of pressure to perform beauty under the guise of health.” This pressure is starting young. In a 2024 survey, 76% of parents reported that their daughters aged 7 to 17 had developed a skincare routine — a number that stunned even seasoned researchers. Experts say social media’s constant stream of beauty content has contributed to lower self-esteem, body dissatisfaction, and even the onset of disordered eating habits in some teens. Who's Keeping Watch? Although TikTok says its platform is for users 13 and older, the study found that younger children are clearly active and exposed to age-inappropriate content. TikTok told CNN it removes underage users when identified and collaborates with adolescent health experts to build safeguards. Still, the platform’s algorithm can be a powerful force, one that curates endless streams of beauty-focused videos to even casual users. For a 10-year-old still developing a sense of identity, the effect can be profound—and harmful. “The pursuit of ‘healthy skin’ has become a socially acceptable way to chase impossible beauty standards,” said Hales. “But when that pursuit involves burning, allergic reactions, and pressure to spend hundreds of dollars—it’s time to pause and reconsider what we’re teaching our kids.”