Latest Influencer News in 2025
Shanghai’s Gold ATM Goes Viral as Record Prices Spark Modern-Day Rush
A futuristic spin on an age-old tradition is making waves in Shanghai—and it’s all thanks to a vending machine that melts gold on the spot. As global gold prices soar to historic highs, residents are lining up in droves to cash in their jewelry through a high-tech “gold recycling ATM,” which has gone viral across social media platforms in China. The phenomenon began shortly after gold prices reached a new record of $2,141.79 per ounce, breaking a peak that had stood since December. In a climate of economic caution and investment uncertainty, the machine has arrived at just the right moment for many looking to convert gold heirlooms into quick cash. How the Gold ATM Works Installed at Shanghai’s Global Harbour shopping mall, the sleek gold recycling machine is part of Shenzhen-based Kinghood Group’s "Smart Gold Store" concept. The ATM-style kiosk accepts gold items over 3 grams with a minimum purity of 50%. Customers place their jewelry into a tray, where the machine weighs it, melts it at over 1,000°C, and tests its purity—all within half an hour. Users are updated on the process via a live screen display. After deducting a small service fee (about $2.50 per gram), the machine deposits the equivalent cash directly into the user’s bank account. No haggling. No waiting days for a quote. Just real-time evaluation and instant payment. Viral Buzz and Social Media Frenzy It didn’t take long for the internet to catch wind of the machine. Videos showing long queues of residents—many of them elderly—spread rapidly on Weibo, Douyin (China’s TikTok), and Xiaohongshu. The footage shows people clutching bags of old jewelry, eagerly watching their items be melted down in front of them. One user posted, “I watched my grandma trade in a necklace from her wedding 50 years ago and get over 10,000 yuan in minutes!” Another commented, “Why would anyone go to a pawn shop anymore? This is so much clearer and quicker.” This digital enthusiasm helped turn what could have been a niche service into a full-blown trend, turning gold selling into an accessible and even trendy experience. Changing the Game for Traditional Gold Traders Not everyone is thrilled by the buzz. Traditional gold shops and small-scale dealers are already feeling the impact. “We can’t compete with that kind of turnaround time,” admitted one jewelry store owner in Shanghai. “Even though our rates are sometimes better, people are choosing convenience over price.” The ATM’s popularity is not just a gimmick—it’s part of Kinghood’s broader strategy. The company has already placed similar machines in over 40 cities across China and is preparing to expand further into hubs like Beijing and Guangzhou. Plans for over 100 new installations are underway. The Timing: Gold’s Meteoric Rise The spike in demand for these machines is closely tied to the rally in gold prices. On April 16, 2024—the day the Shanghai machine went live—domestic gold rates had passed 1,000 yuan per gram. This spike was fueled by ongoing geopolitical tensions and increased demand from global central banks, which continue to stockpile the precious metal as a hedge against inflation. Analysts say more people are seeing gold not just as a sentimental keepsake, but as a liquid asset that can offer real financial relief. Still, experts urge caution. Xu Weixin from the Shanghai Gold Association noted, “We’re at historic highs now, but no one can predict what will happen next. Those selling might benefit today, but they should weigh their long-term options.” The New Face of the Gold Rush What’s remarkable isn’t just the tech—it’s the people behind the trend. Older women, often the caretakers of family heirlooms, are leading the wave, turning wedding bands, old bangles, and inherited trinkets into cash for daily use, savings, or helping family members. This viral ATM has not only revolutionized gold selling—it’s sparked a cultural moment. By combining real-time technology, financial pragmatism, and viral visibility, Shanghai’s gold ATM has given rise to a new kind of gold rush. And with machines set to pop up in more cities soon, this trend shows no signs of cooling down. In a world where speed and simplicity are prized, turning gold into instant cash might just be the new normal.
“Honest Mistake” or Irreparable Harm? Jury Rules New York Times Didn’t Defame Sarah Palin—Again
In a courtroom saga that’s stretched nearly a decade, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin has once again lost her defamation case against The New York Times. A Manhattan jury ruled that the newspaper did not defame the one-time Republican vice-presidential candidate in a controversial 2017 editorial — marking the second time a jury has sided with the Times in this high-profile media battle. The ruling comes after Palin was granted a retrial due to concerns about jury bias in the original 2022 case, which also ended in defeat for her. This time, though, the courtroom was more closely watched, as the verdict could have had far-reaching implications for press freedoms and the legal thresholds public figures must meet in defamation cases. The Controversial Editorial The editorial at the heart of Palin’s lawsuit, titled America’s Lethal Politics, was written by former Times opinion editor James Bennet. It was published in response to a 2017 shooting at a congressional baseball practice, and in it, Bennet referenced a 2011 mass shooting in Arizona that wounded then-Representative Gabby Giffords and left six others dead. The piece included a line suggesting a “clear” link between heated political rhetoric — including a map distributed by a Palin-affiliated PAC that placed stylized crosshairs over certain congressional districts — and the violent act. Though the editorial was quickly corrected (14 hours later), Palin claimed the damage to her reputation had already been done. Palin’s Fight for Accountability Palin sued in 2017, arguing that the Times had acted with “actual malice” — a necessary standard for defamation involving public figures, which requires proof that the publication either knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. Her legal team claimed that the mistake wasn't innocent. In closing arguments, her lawyer Ken Turkel said the editorial was “a life-changer” for Palin, and that the Times’ quick correction didn’t erase the harm done to her public image. But the jury didn’t agree. A Legal Line Not Crossed The Times maintained throughout the trial that the error in the editorial was just that — a mistake, not a malicious or intentional smear campaign. “There has not been one shred of evidence showing anything other than an honest mistake,” said attorney Felicia Ellsworth, who represented the newspaper. That argument ultimately prevailed, with the jury determining there was no defamation. The Times responded with a statement celebrating the verdict as a win for journalistic integrity, saying the outcome “reaffirms an important tenet of American law: publishers are not liable for honest mistakes.” What It Means for Media — and Public Figures This ruling, though centered on Palin, reverberates far beyond one politician’s personal reputation. It reinforces the legal precedent that public figures must meet a high bar to win defamation cases — a standard that has protected journalists and publishers for decades under the First Amendment. Legal analysts suggest this latest decision underscores the difficulty of proving malice without clear evidence of intent or disregard for truth. For Palin and her supporters, it’s a frustrating reminder of just how uphill the battle is for public figures who feel wronged by the press. The Political and Personal Fallout Palin, now 61, hasn’t seen a major political win in years. She lost two congressional bids in Alaska in 2022 and hasn’t held public office since stepping down as governor in 2009. Once a rising star in conservative politics, her influence has faded — though she remains a polarizing figure and frequent media lightning rod. The verdict marks the likely end of her legal campaign against The New York Times. And while the case may be closed, the broader questions it raises — about media responsibility, free speech, and public trust — remain wide open.
RFK Jr.’s Autism Registry Plan Sparks Online Firestorm — Here’s What You Need to Know
A newly announced autism research initiative, backed by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is drawing massive online attention — and not all of it is supportive. The project’s scope is sweeping: it aims to link an unprecedented amount of medical, pharmaceutical, genomic, and wearable data into one centralized platform for autism research. Supporters say it could revolutionize autism science. Critics call it invasive, stigmatizing, and deeply problematic. Social media erupted within hours of the announcement, with #RFKAutismRegistry trending on X (formerly Twitter), Instagram stories buzzing with hot takes, and Reddit threads dissecting the ethics and science behind the effort. On one side are those who believe this represents a turning point in understanding autism. On the other, many argue the entire premise feels more like surveillance than science. What’s the Plan? According to National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, the initiative will consolidate data from a wide range of sources: prescription records from major pharmacy chains, genomic testing data, claims from private insurance, and even fitness data from smartwatches. Medical records from the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Indian Health Service are also part of the mix. All of this will feed into a centralized research platform designed to study autism on a national scale. The most controversial part? A new registry specifically for Americans with autism, which will be integrated into this data trove. Critics argue that labeling and tracking people in this way risks stigmatization — especially considering Kennedy has repeatedly referred to autism as “preventable,” a claim many experts reject outright. RFK Jr. Under Fire Kennedy’s long history of controversial health claims has only amplified the skepticism. While he’s insisted that the study will be ethical, private, and scientifically rigorous, many advocacy groups are voicing concern. "Calling autism preventable is not only inaccurate, it's dangerous," said one parent in a viral TikTok video. "It implies blame. It implies there’s something wrong with our kids.” Others worry about the potential misuse of data. While Bhattacharya has emphasized that researchers will not be able to download the private health information — and that “state-of-the-art protections” will be in place — privacy watchdogs remain wary. Data breaches are not a hypothetical concern, and critics argue that centralizing so much sensitive information is inherently risky. Supporters See a Game-Changer Despite the backlash, there’s a sizable contingent online applauding the initiative. Many point out that autism remains under-researched, and a more complete understanding could lead to better support, therapies, and resources for families. "This could be the biggest autism study in history," wrote one X user. "If it’s done ethically and transparently, the benefits could be huge." Bhattacharya described the project as a "transformative real-world data initiative" aimed at giving researchers broad access to previously fragmented datasets. Between 10 and 20 outside research groups will be selected for funding through the usual NIH grant process to explore questions ranging from basic science to real-world applications in autism care. Science, Ethics, and the Timeline When Kennedy first announced the initiative, he suggested the causes of autism could be pinpointed by September. That bold claim has already been walked back. Bhattacharya, speaking to reporters this week, said they now hope to issue research grants by then, but the research timeline remains flexible. “It’s hard to guarantee when science will make an advance,” he said. “Nature has its say.” The NIH director acknowledged the wide spectrum of autism experiences, noting that research would be designed to reflect the diversity within the autistic community — from highly verbal, independent individuals to those with more significant needs. Where Do You Stand? As the debate rages, one thing is clear: this initiative has touched a nerve. It sits at the intersection of public health, personal privacy, disability rights, and trust in government — all hot-button issues in today’s digital age. Whether this project becomes a landmark study or an ongoing controversy will depend largely on how it’s executed — and whether it can earn the trust of the very communities it aims to serve. So, where do you land? Is this the breakthrough autism research needs — or a step too far?
Did Jeffree Star Reveal His Affair With Kanye West On Twitter?
Jeffree Star has once again ignited the internet—this time with just eight words. On April 22, the beauty mogul tweeted, “Ok f*ck it.. The rumors were true,” prompting social media users to speculate whether he was finally confirming the long-circulated rumor about an alleged affair with Kanye West. The tweet comes at a particularly charged time for Kanye, who is facing backlash over the lyrics of his newly released track Cousin. The controversial song has stirred conversations online, especially as it touches on disturbing family history. The timing of Jeffree’s message has raised eyebrows, with many wondering whether it’s a subtle dig or an intentional revelation. A Rumor That Just Won’t Die The rumors linking Star and West first exploded in early 2021, when TikTok influencer Ava Louise alleged that the rapper had been romantically involved with a “very famous male beauty guru.” Internet sleuths quickly connected the dots, pointing to Star due to his residence in Wyoming—coincidentally, the same state where Kanye owned a ranch at the time—and an old lyric from Star referencing West. Despite the internet frenzy, Star was quick to deny the rumor in a YouTube video titled “Addressing The Kanye Situation.” Laughing off the accusation, he said, “This is so stupid... I’ve never even hung out with Kanye.” He went further to joke, “Let me just say this once—I like very tall men,” hinting that West wasn’t his type. Ava Louise later admitted she made the story up entirely, claiming she wanted to stir up drama. Still, the internet never really let the narrative go, and Star continued to face questions about it in various interviews, including with Logan Paul and US Weekly. Each time, he denied any involvement and called the rumor ridiculous. Is Jeffree Changing His Story? That’s the question fans are grappling with after Star’s latest tweet. The lack of context has only fueled speculation. One user on X (formerly Twitter) commented, “Wait what does this mean?” while another chimed in, “Is this about Kanye???” So far, Kanye West and his representatives have remained silent on the matter. Given the rapper’s recent history of airing deeply personal content online, fans are split between thinking Star is trying to stir the pot—or that he’s actually hinting at a real story. Troll Move or Truth Bomb? Jeffree Star is no stranger to controversy or viral moments. From beauty industry feuds to political drama, the entrepreneur knows how to command attention online. Some believe this tweet is simply another example of Star’s ability to hijack trending topics and spin them into publicity. But others wonder whether there’s more to the story than he previously let on. Could Star be referencing a fleeting encounter? Was his earlier denial meant to protect someone’s privacy? Or is this just Star poking fun at a rumor that refuses to die? Regardless of his intentions, Star’s post has succeeded in reigniting one of the internet’s favorite pop culture conspiracies. With millions of views and thousands of reposts, the buzz shows no sign of slowing down. No Confirmation From Kanye As of now, Kanye has neither confirmed nor denied the rumor. Given the rapper’s unpredictable social media habits and the chaotic nature of his recent posts, it’s unclear if he’ll even address it. But one thing is for sure—when it comes to Jeffree Star and Kanye West, the internet never forgets. Whether this is a real admission or just another layer of internet trolling, fans are eating it up—and begging for more. Until then, the truth remains somewhere between a tweet and a tall tale.
Viral Aussie Twins Trained by Steve Irwin: The Incredible Story Behind Paula and Bridgette Powers
They may have gone viral for a surreal TV interview about a local crime, but sisters Paula and Bridgette Powers are much more than just a quirky viral moment. The identical twins from Queensland have dedicated their lives to caring for Australia’s native birds—and their story is deeply intertwined with the legacy of one of the country’s most beloved conservationists. The Powers twins recently caught global attention after a 90-second segment aired on Channel 7 News. The clip, which showed the pair speaking in perfect unison and dressed identically, detailed their eyewitness account of an alleged carjacking near their Sunshine Coast home. While the bizarre synchronicity of their responses drew laughs and fascination, many viewers had no idea about the twins' lifelong dedication to wildlife rescue. A Life of Service to Wildlife Paula and Bridgette Powers are not your average viral sensations. For years, the duo has operated Twinnies Pelican and Seabird Rescue, a not-for-profit organization committed to rehabilitating injured or sick coastal birds. They’ve cared for everything from pelicans tangled in fishing lines to young ducks in need of rehoming. In fact, just days before their unexpected TV fame, the twins shared a heartwarming update on social media showing more than a dozen ducks they had raised and safely released back into the wild. What truly sets their story apart, however, is their mentorship under none other than Steve Irwin—the legendary Crocodile Hunter. Trained by Irwin himself, the twins credit much of their hands-on skills and passion for animal care to the late conservation icon. Their calm, unified approach to rescue work reflects not just their close bond as siblings, but also a deeply instilled ethos of compassion and respect for nature. A Viral Moment with a Serious Backstory The recent media spotlight came after a dramatic roadside incident. While driving on Steve Irwin Way, the Powers family encountered a vehicle that had crashed. As their mother approached the car to offer help, the driver—covered in blood—allegedly pulled a gun. Paula and Bridgette described their panic in perfect harmony during the interview, saying, "Our hearts started to pound. And I said Mum, where's Mum?" They recalled how their mother managed to distract the man long enough for all three to escape safely. The man involved has since been charged with multiple offences, including armed robbery and dangerous driving causing death. Thankfully, the Powers family was unharmed—but the encounter added another dramatic chapter to the twins’ already extraordinary story. Not Their First Time in the Spotlight This isn’t the first time the sisters have gone viral. Back in 2016, they charmed audiences on Good Morning Britain, where they were interviewed by Piers Morgan and Susannah Reid. Once again, their identical speech patterns and infectious laughter stole the show. At the time, the twins acknowledged how deeply connected they feel. “Sometimes we do feel like just one person,” they admitted. In the wake of their recent interview, the Powers twins have been featured in countless online posts and even a parody by Australian comedian Devon Poole. But as amusing as the public finds their synchronized quirks, the twins remain focused on their mission. How You Can Help While they’re currently taking a short break from interviews, Paula and Bridgette are still active on social media, sharing updates on the birds they care for. Their passion is real, and their work is vital—especially as Australia's native wildlife faces increasing threats from habitat loss and human interference. For those inspired by their story, donations to their rescue organization can go a long way in helping them continue their work. Whether it's rescuing pelicans, raising orphaned ducklings, or rehabilitating injured magpies, the Twinnies have proven that two hearts—and four hands—can make a world of difference. From being mentored by Steve Irwin to becoming a viral phenomenon, the Powers twins are a one-of-a-kind duo whose story is equal parts heartwarming and heroic.
Cinco De Mayo Cancelled In Chicago: Here’s The Heartbreaking Reason Why
Chicago’s vibrant and long-standing Cinco de Mayo Parade has been cancelled this year, and the reason has sparked heartbreak, outrage, and debate across the city. The decision, announced by organizers on Thursday, stems from deep concerns about possible Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activity supported by Donald Trump, targeting the city's immigrant communities. The parade, a fixture in the city's cultural calendar and a beloved celebration of Mexican heritage, was scheduled to take place on Chicago’s Southwest Side. But amid increasing fear of immigration raids tied to the Trump administration's renewed push for mass deportations, organizers say safety must come first. “Our people are scared,” said Hector Escobar, President of the Casa Puebla & Cermak Road Chamber of Commerce. “Some of them don’t even want to go to work. They feel like they’re being hunted.” Fear Replaces Festivity The parade’s cancellation is a devastating blow to many in Chicago’s Mexican American community. What began as a commemoration of the 1862 Battle of Puebla has evolved into a proud celebration of culture, history, and identity. But this year, many would-be attendees are choosing to stay home out of fear they could be detained or deported. Chicago, a designated sanctuary city, has long positioned itself as a place of protection for immigrants, regardless of legal status. However, recent threats from federal officials and reports of raids have shaken that sense of security. Community members are worried that the parade could become a trap, drawing out undocumented individuals and making them vulnerable to arrest. Escobar made it clear that the decision wasn’t about money or logistics. “We had enough sponsors. We could’ve made it work,” he said. “But it’s about safety. We don’t want people to come celebrate and end up in custody.” ICE Raids Spark Tension Across the City The Trump administration has made immigration enforcement a cornerstone of its policy agenda. Since the start of Trump’s second term, Chicago has faced increased scrutiny. According to organizers, ICE activity has stretched from the city into surrounding suburbs, creating a climate of fear that extends beyond just parade day. Tom Homan, Trump’s so-called “border czar” and former acting head of ICE, previously named Chicago as a top priority for enforcement actions. At a political event in December, Homan issued a stern warning to local leaders: support the raids or get out of the way. “If your mayor or governor won’t help, then don’t interfere,” he said. The threat felt real to many. In January, multiple reports surfaced of workplaces, stores, and even churches appearing unusually empty. In Joliet, a factory that typically sees 40 to 50 workers per shift had only 10 show up. Community members described eerily quiet streets and parking lots, even at places like Home Depot and Walmart that typically bustle with day laborers and shoppers. A History of Setbacks This isn’t the first time Chicago’s Cinco de Mayo Parade has been put on hold. It was cancelled from 2018 to 2022 due to the COVID-19 pandemic and internal disagreements between organizers and city officials. Last year’s parade also faced unexpected disruption due to a flare-up of gang violence that forced a reroute and ended in several arrests. Still, the hope had been that 2025 would mark a strong return. Instead, the parade is once again off the calendar—this time due to fears far more personal and immediate. Looking Ahead While there is no clear answer as to whether the parade will resume next year, organizers are cautiously optimistic—though they say it depends on what happens with federal immigration policy. “At this point, we don’t know what’s going to happen next year,” Escobar admitted. “If the deportations continue like this, we’ll have to make the same choice again.” For now, what was meant to be a joyful day of culture and community has turned into a painful reminder of the fear and uncertainty many immigrant families live with every day.
Disney May Hit Pause on Live-Action Remakes After ‘Snow White’ Stumbles at the Box Office
Disney’s strategy of turning its classic animated films into big-budget live-action spectacles might be running out of magic. The latest example — the 2025 remake of Snow White — has stumbled at the box office, raising questions inside and outside the studio about whether it’s time to pump the brakes on this remake formula. The Snow White remake, directed by Marc Webb and starring Rachel Zegler and Gal Gadot, was expected to be a major hit for Disney. Instead, it’s proving to be one of the studio’s biggest live-action flops in recent memory. With a reported production budget of $250 to $270 million and additional costs for marketing, the film needed to earn well over $600 million globally just to break even. As of its fifth weekend, it’s pulled in only about $183.4 million worldwide. That’s not just underwhelming — it’s a financial red flag. This isn't the first time a Disney live-action remake has fallen short, but Snow White is a standout because of its sheer scale and the expectations that surrounded it. Unlike Mulan (2020), which was released amid pandemic-related theater closures, Snow White had the advantage of a full theatrical run and global availability. Yet, it’s still trailing far behind in earnings, making it only the second Disney remake to not recoup its budget in theaters. A number of factors may have contributed to Snow White’s disappointing run. Controversy over the film’s creative direction, including reimagining the classic story’s dwarfs, political statements made by cast members, and its lukewarm reviews (39% on Rotten Tomatoes), have all likely played a role. Combined, they’ve created a perfect storm of negative buzz that likely hurt ticket sales. Disney's live-action remake boom started strong with Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland in 2010, which crossed the billion-dollar mark at the global box office. Hits like The Jungle Book, Beauty and the Beast, and The Lion King followed, all of which were billion-dollar earners. These successes cemented the live-action remake trend as a major part of Disney’s release strategy for over a decade. But not every remake has turned into box office gold. Dumbo (2019) and The Little Mermaid (2023) came close but ultimately fell short of their estimated break-even points. Still, most entries in the remake roster — including Aladdin (2019), which made over $1 billion — have been solid financial wins. In total, Disney’s live-action remakes have grossed over $8 billion at the global box office, compared to an estimated combined break-even cost of about $5.2 billion. That sounds profitable — and it is — but the margin narrows when you factor in the losses from streaming-exclusive titles like Pinocchio, Lady and the Tramp, and Peter Pan & Wendy, none of which brought in box office revenue and came with their own hefty production budgets. Looking ahead, Disney still has remakes in the pipeline, including Lilo & Stitch and a live-action version of Moana scheduled for 2026. But after the Snow White fallout, there’s speculation that the studio may reconsider how aggressively it pursues these projects — or at least how much money it’s willing to pour into them. The lesson from Snow White may be simple: nostalgia alone isn’t enough to guarantee box office success. Audience expectations have evolved, and the formula that worked a decade ago may now be in need of some serious rethinking. If Disney wants to continue reimagining its classics, it may need to scale back the budgets, get more selective with titles, and focus on innovation rather than repetition. Otherwise, the magic might keep fading — one remake at a time.
What’s Going On With Katie Price? Fans Voice Concern Online Over Her Changed Appearance
Katie Price has always been a familiar face in the spotlight, but her most recent photos have left fans alarmed. The 46-year-old former glamour model posted a series of selfies on Facebook that quickly drew attention — and not necessarily for the reasons she may have hoped. Her dramatically slimmer frame and tightly pulled facial features have sparked an outpouring of concern from longtime supporters. In the images, Katie is seen posing in skimpy teddy bear-themed pajamas that showed off her noticeably lean figure. Her long dark hair was slicked back and styled, and she wore a beaming smile. Despite the cheerful caption reading simply “Self care,” many fans weren’t convinced. “You don’t look well,” one fan commented. Others echoed similar sentiments, lamenting that the once “natural beauty” has become nearly “unrecognizable” after years of cosmetic procedures. “It’s a shame. You were so beautiful. Now it’s gone too far,” another commenter wrote. Katie, who has undergone at least six facelifts and is known for her love of plastic surgery, has been increasingly candid about her appearance. Despite online speculation that she may be using weight-loss injections like Ozempic, Katie insists her transformation has been natural. She attributes her recent weight loss to a revamped diet and exercise routine. Speaking with The Sun, she explained that cutting out carb-heavy foods like potatoes and pasta had made a significant difference. “They just puffed me up and made me fart,” she said bluntly. “Now that I eat better, I don’t feel bloated anymore.” Still, her explanation hasn’t done much to quiet the buzz online. Many are concerned that her physical changes may reflect deeper issues, with some urging her to take a break from social media and focus on her well-being. “Self care means being kind to your body and mind,” one user wrote, urging Katie to speak with a therapist and reevaluate her lifestyle. While her own transformation has dominated headlines, Katie is also facing emotional challenges at home. She recently opened up on Snapchat about her eldest son, Harvey, who is battling severe health complications due to his weight. The 22-year-old, who is blind, autistic, and has Prader-Willi syndrome — a rare genetic condition known to cause insatiable hunger — now weighs nearly 30 stone (over 400 pounds). “I’m so heartbroken and gutted,” Katie said in a candid video update. She shared that his increasing size has left him struggling to walk and dangerously close to suffering a heart attack. “It’s affecting his quality of life,” she added, describing how difficult it is to see him unable to do basic tasks like putting on shoes or going for a stroll. Katie has been working with doctors to get Harvey started on a course of Mounjaro — a weight-loss injection considered even more powerful than Ozempic. The aim is to help him reach a healthier weight and avoid life-threatening complications. “Obesity and his condition are a sad mix,” she said. “He doesn’t even fully understand what’s happening, but I’m going to help him through it.” Despite her own controversies and the scrutiny she faces, Katie has remained vocal about advocating for her son’s health. It’s a battle she says she won’t give up on. As for her own well-being, fans can only hope she’s receiving the same level of care and attention that she’s trying to provide for Harvey. For now, though, concern lingers — with many wondering whether Katie’s quest for reinvention has come at too high a price.
Don’t Say Please And Thank You To ChatGPT – It Can Cost Millions
If you’re in the habit of being polite to AI — tossing in a friendly “please” or “thank you” when chatting with ChatGPT — you might be surprised to learn it’s not just good manners; it’s expensive. According to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, those small courtesies are adding up to a surprisingly high cost for the company. Altman recently responded to a user on X (formerly Twitter) who asked whether politeness toward ChatGPT affected operating costs. His answer? Yes — and in a big way. He said that users’ tendency to pad their prompts with pleasantries is part of what’s costing OpenAI “tens of millions of dollars.” He even described the expense as “well spent,” though he left the comment open-ended with a cryptic “you never know.” It may sound like a joke, but there’s a serious explanation behind it. ChatGPT, like other AI chatbots, runs on massive neural networks called large language models (LLMs). These models are powered by an army of GPUs (graphics processing units), which are housed in energy-hungry data centers. Every interaction with ChatGPT — even short ones — requires significant computational power. Adding extra words, like “please” and “thank you,” means slightly more data to process, slightly more tokens to parse, and ultimately, slightly more power consumed per interaction. Now multiply that by billions. It’s estimated that a single prompt-response exchange can use up to 0.14 kilowatt-hours of energy — the same amount of electricity needed to keep 14 LED lightbulbs on for an hour. When scaled across millions (if not billions) of daily interactions, those little extras compound into a major energy burden. Globally, data centers already account for about 2% of electricity use. With the explosion of AI tools and growing demand for services like ChatGPT, energy use is poised to rise even further. As people engage with these systems more frequently — and more politely — the invisible costs grow. Still, not everyone agrees that politeness is a waste. Some experts argue that saying “please” and “thank you” to AI isn’t just for show. Kurtis Beavers, part of Microsoft’s Copilot design team, advocates for respectful prompts. He says that when users phrase their questions politely, the AI is more likely to respond in a friendly, cooperative tone — an interaction style that could be valuable in workplace settings and other professional environments. Microsoft’s WorkLab has echoed this sentiment, noting that “when it clocks politeness, it’s more likely to be polite back.” That means the tone you set with your words can influence the tone you receive — even from a machine. A 2024 survey found that 67% of Americans regularly use courteous language with AI. Among them, most say it’s just the right thing to do. Interestingly, a small but vocal group (about 12%) admitted they use manners “just in case” — jokingly referencing a future where robots might remember who was nice to them. But jokes aside, politeness toward AI is starting to raise questions. Is it worth the cost? Does being polite matter if the recipient isn’t a person? And can we afford to keep typing in extra words that may seem small but, on a global scale, carry a multi-million-dollar energy price tag? Altman seems to think it’s a price worth paying — at least for now. Whether that sentiment holds as energy demands rise and environmental concerns mount remains to be seen. So the next time you thank ChatGPT for helping with a recipe, resume, or research — just know that you’re participating in a modern dilemma: balancing digital etiquette with real-world impact.
Ice Bucket Challenge 2025: Why It’s Trending Again—and What’s Different This Time
If you were active on social media back in 2014, you probably remember the Ice Bucket Challenge—those viral videos of people pouring freezing water over themselves to raise awareness for ALS. It was a global movement that saw everyone from your next-door neighbor to celebrities like Oprah and Bill Gates taking part. Now, in 2025, the challenge is back. But this time, it’s taken on a new cause—and it's once again striking a chord online. From ALS to Mental Health: A Shift in Purpose Originally launched to raise funds and awareness for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), the Ice Bucket Challenge raised over $115 million in just a few months. That money led to significant breakthroughs in ALS research, including identifying the NEK1 gene, which is now linked to many ALS cases. The campaign wasn’t just a social media trend—it genuinely pushed scientific progress forward. Fast forward to today, and while the cold water is still very much part of the deal, the mission has shifted. The 2025 version of the Ice Bucket Challenge is focusing on something just as critical: mental health. Meet #SpeakYourMIND: The Ice Bucket Challenge 2.0 The reboot of the challenge was spearheaded by the Mental Illness Needs Discussion (MIND) Club at the University of South Carolina. Called #SpeakYourMIND, the campaign was launched by student Wade Jefferson in memory of two close friends he lost to suicide. What began as a small fundraiser aiming for $500 has exploded into a viral movement, raising over $190,000 for Active Minds, a nonprofit focused on mental health support for young people. The format remains familiar: dump a bucket of ice water on your head, film it, post it, nominate others, and donate. But now, instead of funding ALS research, the money goes toward mental health programs in schools, universities, and communities. A Mixed Bag of Reactions As with any reboot, the updated Ice Bucket Challenge has drawn a range of opinions. Supporters applaud the new focus, saying it’s a creative and meaningful way to break the stigma surrounding mental illness. Others worry it might take away from the original cause, which still needs attention and funding. Even the ALS Association, the organization that benefited from the original challenge, has responded, expressing support for this new version and the positive impact it’s making. One thing's for sure—this isn’t just a nostalgic throwback. It’s a sign that viral campaigns can adapt and stay relevant by tackling urgent issues in fresh ways. How to Join the Movement Want to get involved in the 2025 Ice Bucket Challenge? It’s easy: Fill a bucket with ice water. Record yourself pouring it over your head. Post your video on social media using the hashtag #SpeakYourMIND. Nominate a few friends to do the same. Donate to Active Minds or a mental health organization of your choice. It’s a small act that can spark meaningful conversations—and help fund mental health resources that are in higher demand than ever. More Than Just a Trend The return of the Ice Bucket Challenge proves that internet activism, when done right, still has power. Whether it’s raising millions for disease research or prompting open dialogue about mental health, this viral challenge continues to show that a little creativity and a lot of compassion can go a long way. So if your feed starts filling up with ice water again, don’t be surprised. This time, it’s not just about feeling cold—it’s about speaking up.
Is Billy Ray Cyrus Dating Elizabeth Hurley? A Look at Their Relationship Timeline So Far
Rumors are swirling around a surprising celebrity duo—country music legend Billy Ray Cyrus and British actress and model Elizabeth Hurley. The pair sparked relationship speculation after Hurley shared a photo on Instagram of the two looking cozy on Easter Sunday. The sweet image showed Cyrus, 63, giving Hurley, 59, a kiss on the cheek, with the caption simply reading, “Happy Easter.” Naturally, fans started buzzing about a possible new romance. A Cozy Easter Moment The holiday photo, posted to Hurley’s Instagram, wasn’t just a friendly snap. Hurley looked relaxed in a blue flannel and jeans, leaning into Cyrus, who was smiling warmly for the camera. She tagged Billy Ray in the post, and her son Damian Hurley even chimed in with celebratory emojis in the comments. The intimate nature of the photo left many wondering if something more than friendship is going on between the two stars. Their Shared History Cyrus and Hurley aren’t strangers. They worked together on the 2022 film Christmas in Paradise, where they reportedly became close during filming. Since then, fans have noticed a few signs that their bond may go beyond professional. Earlier this month, Hurley posted a beachside video of herself in a bronze bikini while vacationing in the Maldives—featuring one of Cyrus' songs, “She’s Not Cryin’ Anymore,” as the soundtrack. She also tagged him in that post. While neither has officially confirmed a romantic relationship, these subtle clues have added fuel to the fire. Billy Ray Cyrus: Freshly Divorced Cyrus recently finalized his third divorce. He split from singer Firerose (born Johanna Rosie Hodges) in August 2024, just seven months after their wedding. The divorce was anything but quiet—Cyrus filed for annulment citing "inappropriate marital conduct" and later called the short-lived marriage a “scam,” saying it left him emotionally and physically shaken. In legal documents, both Cyrus and Firerose agreed that the marriage was brief and that they had no shared property or assets. He expressed relief following the split, describing the ordeal as one of the most chaotic periods of his life. Elizabeth Hurley’s Past Relationships Hurley, too, has had a high-profile romantic history. She was married to businessman Arun Nayar from 2007 to 2010. She also dated the late Steve Bing, with whom she shares her son Damian. One of her most well-known relationships was with actor Hugh Grant, whom she dated for over a decade. Despite enduring public scandal and Grant’s infamous 1995 arrest, the couple remained together until 2000. Interestingly, Grant remains close to Hurley and is Damian’s godfather. Now at 59, Hurley remains a style icon and is still very active on social media, often sharing glimpses of her glamorous lifestyle and travels. Her recent posts with Billy Ray have only added to the intrigue. No Official Confirmation (Yet) Representatives for both Hurley and Cyrus have remained silent on the dating rumors. Still, the Easter photo, playful social media tags, and mutual admiration are enough to keep fans guessing. Neither has addressed their current relationship status publicly, but their interactions suggest there may be more than just friendship between them. What’s Next? Whether this is the beginning of a new romance or just two friends enjoying each other’s company, it’s clear there’s a connection. Given both stars’ recent personal transitions—Cyrus' divorce and Hurley’s single status—it’s not entirely surprising that they may have found comfort and companionship in each other. As fans continue to speculate, one thing is for sure: this unexpected pairing has captured everyone’s attention. Whether they go public with a relationship or keep things private, Billy Ray Cyrus and Elizabeth Hurley are definitely one of 2025’s most talked-about duos.
Oblivion Remake Leaks: Release Date, Rumored Features and Everything We Know So Far
Eighteen years after its original release, The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion may be on the verge of a major comeback. According to multiple leaks that went viral, a full remake—or a remastered edition—of the beloved RPG is reportedly in the works, offering updated graphics, new content, and cross-platform support. Here's a breakdown of everything we know so far, including the rumored editions, features, and potential release window. Development and Studio Involvement According to recent reports, the Oblivion remake is being developed as a joint effort between Bethesda and Virtuos, a studio known for helping bring major franchises to modern platforms. Specifically, Bethesda’s teams in Dallas and Rockville are said to be involved. While Bethesda has not officially confirmed the project, several leaked documents and images suggest the remake is deep into development and nearing completion. What Platforms Will It Be On? One of the most exciting revelations from the leaks is the potential platform availability. Early rumors suggested that the remake would be limited to PC and Xbox. However, newer leaks indicate that the game may also launch on PlayStation 5, expanding its audience significantly. If true, this would mark a major milestone for PlayStation fans who’ve long wanted access to classic Bethesda RPGs. Leaked Release Window Though Bethesda has yet to officially announce a release date, leaks point to a launch window around the week of April 21. While this hasn't been confirmed, the increasing number of leaks—including images and promotional materials—suggest an announcement could be just around the corner. There’s even speculation that Bethesda could “shadow drop” the game, releasing it the same day it's officially revealed. Deluxe Edition and Exclusive Content One of the more intriguing leaks involves the Oblivion Remake Deluxe Edition. Images reportedly pulled from Resetera show promotional artwork for this upgraded version, although no pricing details have been disclosed. According to the leaked information, the Deluxe Edition may include bonus in-game items like new weapons and armor—including the return of the infamous horse armor, a piece of content that has become somewhat of a meme among Elder Scrolls fans. The weapons list could potentially expand from the original’s offering of daggers, katanas, war axes, and shortswords, which would be a welcome enhancement to the game’s combat system. Additionally, while horses were the only rideable option in the original game, the rumored armor upgrades for them could add a fun layer of customization and utility. Will There Be Early Access? There’s still no official word on whether early access will be available for the remake. Given Bethesda’s history, it’s possible that the Deluxe Edition could come with a few perks like early gameplay access, but nothing has been confirmed. If the game does launch as a surprise release, early access may not be a factor at all. Community Buzz and Speculation The fan community has been buzzing with anticipation. Screenshots, file size information reportedly found on Steam, and promotional materials continue to leak, fueling speculation that the game’s release is imminent. Many fans are hoping that this remake stays true to the original while updating the visuals and mechanics to meet modern standards. Final Thoughts While we’re still waiting for an official confirmation from Bethesda, all signs point to a highly-anticipated return of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion. With modern graphics, expanded platform support, and potential new content through a Deluxe Edition, the remake could be one of the year’s most exciting RPG revivals. Stay tuned for more updates, and keep an eye on official Bethesda channels in case the announcement—and release—comes sooner than expected.
Netflix Eyes Creator-Led Survival Show to Compete with MrBeast’s ‘Beast Games’
Netflix is setting its sights on the creator economy, and it’s taking inspiration from some of reality TV’s biggest hits. Following the massive success of Amazon Prime Video’s Beast Games—a high-stakes competition show featuring YouTube megastar MrBeast—Netflix is reportedly in early talks to create a similar reality series, but with a twist: the lead star would be a digital creator. According to multiple sources familiar with the discussions, Netflix has referenced long-running formats like Survivor and The Bachelor in meetings, encouraging creators to develop their own versions of those shows. While nothing has been greenlit yet, it’s clear the streamer wants a signature competition series built around a popular online personality. Creator Collaboration at the Core Unlike past efforts by traditional media companies to adapt influencer content to TV—with mixed results—Netflix appears to be taking a different approach. Insiders say the company is giving creators more creative input and flexibility when pitching their own take on classic reality formats. One person close to the talks explained that Netflix specifically mentioned the success of Beast Games and asked creators to put their own spin on similar show structures. Instead of squeezing influencers into outdated formats, the streamer seems intent on building something new from the ground up—co-developed with creators themselves. This shift in strategy comes as Netflix continues experimenting with unscripted content. The platform has already seen success with shows like Love Is Blind and Squid Game: The Challenge, both of which have pulled in strong viewership thanks to their bingeable formats and viral moments. Netflix’s latest effort to tap into the creator space, Pop The Balloon—a live dating show adapted from YouTube—received a more muted response, but it's part of a larger trend of trying to crack the code on creator-led TV. Netflix Doubles Down on YouTubers Netflix’s interest in digital creators is nothing new. The company has already partnered with notable online stars, including the Sidemen and Ms. Rachel. Earlier this month, it released Bad Influence: The Dark Side of Kidfluencing, a docuseries centered on controversial child star Piper Rockelle. These moves reflect Netflix’s broader effort to bridge the gap between online and traditional entertainment. Executives at Netflix are also making the case that the platform can offer something YouTube can’t: upfront payments and access to a global audience. On a recent earnings call, co-CEO Ted Sarandos emphasized that Netflix is actively looking for “the next generation of great creators” and is open to finding them anywhere, from YouTube to TikTok and beyond. Why Competition Shows Matter As Netflix looks to boost engagement and slow down subscriber churn in saturated markets like the U.S. and Canada, competition shows offer a strategic advantage. They are relatively low-cost, easy to localize, and highly engaging for binge-watchers and advertisers alike. Alejandro Rojas, VP of applied analytics at Parrot Analytics, noted that competition formats are particularly attractive because they generate emotional investment and repeat viewership. “A strong creator-led competition show could be just as impactful as a major scripted drama,” he explained. “And once a format proves itself in one region, it can easily be adapted globally.” Having a recognizable online personality lead the show could also help attract younger viewers who have increasingly shifted their attention away from traditional TV to platforms like YouTube. According to Nielsen data, YouTube now commands 12% of total TV viewership, up from 6% in 2021. Netflix has grown as well, but at a slower pace—currently sitting at around 8%. What’s Next? While the creator-led survival or dating competition show is still in development, Netflix’s intentions are clear: it wants to bring more influencers into its orbit and develop reality formats that appeal to Gen Z and millennial audiences. If successful, this strategy could create Netflix’s answer to Beast Games—and possibly ignite a new era of creator-powered reality TV. Whether Netflix’s version of Survivor becomes the next streaming hit remains to be seen, but one thing’s certain: the race to dominate the creator-led competition space is officially on.
Mark Zuckerberg Admits Facebook Is Losing Its Cool — And He’s Not Sure How to Fix It
Mark Zuckerberg knows Facebook isn’t cool anymore — and he’s been concerned about that for years. Recently revealed internal emails between Zuckerberg and Tom Alison, the head of Facebook, highlight Meta’s growing anxiety over the social network’s declining relevance. The messages, dated April 2022, were submitted as part of the Federal Trade Commission’s ongoing antitrust case against Meta and paint a candid picture of the platform’s cultural struggles. While Facebook still boasts steady engagement numbers, Zuckerberg made it clear in the emails that cultural influence is a much more important — and worrisome — metric. “Even though the FB app’s engagement is steady in many places, it feels like its cultural relevance is decreasing quickly,” Zuckerberg wrote. “And I worry that this may be a leading indicator of future health issues.” The tone of the exchange shows a CEO grappling with the idea that younger users — and the internet at large — have largely moved on to other platforms. The Problem With Friending One of Zuckerberg’s biggest concerns was how outdated the core structure of Facebook felt. The concept of “friending” people — once a revolutionary idea — now seemed clunky and irrelevant. “People’s friend graphs are stale,” he wrote, “and the act of adding someone as a friend on Facebook feels too heavy. Would you rather be seen adding someone on Facebook or on Instagram?” He even floated a radical idea: starting over completely by wiping everyone’s friend networks and letting users rebuild from scratch. The Follow vs. Friend Divide Another key issue Zuckerberg identified was that Facebook hadn’t embraced the follower model that drives engagement on platforms like Instagram, Twitter, and TikTok. Instead of keeping up, Facebook stuck with its “friends-first” identity — and that may have been a mistake. “Every other modern social network is built on following,” Zuckerberg acknowledged. “It’s possible the FB app is just outdated because it never adopted this fundamental innovation.” Groups Aren’t the Answer Facebook’s push to center its platform around communities — especially through Groups — hasn’t delivered the cultural clout Meta hoped for. Even Zuckerberg expressed doubt. “I’m optimistic about community messaging,” he said. “But after several years of investing in Groups, I’m not sure how much further we can push this. It’s possible groups will just never be as big as friending or following.” Reels Can’t Save Facebook Alone In 2022, Facebook had just rolled out Reels — its short-form video feature designed to compete with TikTok. While Zuckerberg was on board with shifting resources toward Reels, he admitted that the experience lacked the personal connection Facebook was once known for. Reels “reduce the social sense of feeling connected to the person creating the content,” he noted. The content being served up felt too similar to what users might find on other apps and lacked a distinct Facebook identity. Alison echoed that sentiment, responding that Facebook doesn’t “have a culturally relevant public content ecosystem” and instead is dominated by “commoditized news and video publisher content.” Competition — Even From Inside Meta Interestingly, one of Facebook’s toughest competitors may be its own sibling: Instagram. While Facebook has struggled to stay fresh, Instagram continues to thrive with younger users and remains more culturally resonant. Zuckerberg pointed out the need to differentiate the two without cannibalizing either. “We need a strategy that doesn’t leave one service picking up scraps from the other,” he said. “Right now, IG is doing well on cultural relevance and FB isn’t.” The emails provide a rare look into the high-level worries at Meta about the future of Facebook. With TikTok, YouTube, Reddit, BeReal, and even newer players like Poparazzi attracting younger users, Facebook faces an uphill battle to recapture its former influence — if it can at all.
Pope Francis Dies Aged 88 on Easter Monday: A Humble Shepherd Remembered
Pope Francis, the first Jesuit and first Latin American pope, passed away peacefully on Easter Monday, April 21, 2025, at the age of 88. The Holy Father died at his residence in the Vatican’s Casa Santa Marta, following complications related to a prolonged respiratory illness. The announcement came at 9:45 a.m. from Cardinal Kevin Farrell, Camerlengo of the Apostolic Chamber. “Dearest brothers and sisters,” he said, “with deep sorrow I must announce the death of our Holy Father Francis. At 7:35 this morning, the Bishop of Rome, Francis, returned to the house of the Father. His life was dedicated entirely to serving the Lord and His Church.” Pope Francis, born Jorge Mario Bergoglio in Buenos Aires, Argentina, underwent lung surgery in his early twenties and continued to experience respiratory issues throughout his life. He had been hospitalized at the Agostino Gemelli Polyclinic in February 2025 with bronchitis, which later developed into bilateral pneumonia. Though he returned to the Vatican after a 38-day hospital stay, his condition steadily declined. His health challenges had long affected his papacy. In late 2023, he canceled a planned trip to the United Arab Emirates due to flu and inflammation in his lungs. Despite his struggles, Francis continued to work, even approving a revised version of the liturgical rites for papal funerals in April 2024. The updated Ordo Exsequiarum Romani Pontificis includes simplified funeral procedures and reflects the pope’s wish for humility and a focus on Christ’s resurrection rather than worldly power. Francis had often referred to himself as a “sinner,” but his influence was immense. Elected on March 13, 2013, after Pope Benedict XVI’s resignation, he was an unexpected choice. Bergoglio had finished second in the 2005 conclave and did not anticipate being elected in 2013. However, frustration among cardinals over Vatican bureaucracy, scandals, and the Church’s handling of abuse led to a desire for reform. Bergoglio’s reputation as a straight-talking reformer helped him gain momentum, and on the fifth round of voting, he surpassed the two-thirds majority needed. Upon accepting the papacy, Cardinal Cláudio Hummes of Brazil embraced him and urged, “Don’t forget the poor!” Pope Francis took the name of St. Francis of Assisi and made poverty and compassion central to his mission. “Without a solution to the problems of the poor, we cannot resolve the problems of the world,” he said in 2015. Over his 12-year papacy, Francis made headlines for his outspoken positions on global issues. He helped broker a thaw in relations between the United States and Cuba and played a behind-the-scenes role in Colombia’s peace process. He consistently challenged populist and nationalist movements in Europe and the U.S., famously questioning whether Donald Trump’s policies were in line with Christian values. Francis also made interfaith dialogue a hallmark of his leadership. He built bridges with Muslim leaders, especially at Al Azhar University in Cairo, and took bold steps to visit areas torn by conflict, including Iraq in 2021. He advocated for the rights of marginalized religious groups such as the Yazidis and Rohingya and issued powerful apologies for the Church’s historical failures—from the abuse crisis in Ireland to the treatment of Indigenous children in Canadian residential schools. While his message sometimes clashed with political trends, he remained a spiritual voice for peace, justice, and humility. Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi once called Francis “a global conscience, even if it’s a losing effort.” Pope Francis’ funeral details have yet to be formally announced, but the rites will follow the simplified procedures he approved. In death, as in life, he rejected grandeur, seeking instead to bear witness to the teachings of Christ.